Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lingeman, JE; Preminger, GM; Goldfischer, ER; Krambeck, AE; Comfort Study Team,
Published in: J Urol
June 2009

PURPOSE: We assessed the near term comfort of newly designed ureteral study stents or marketed control stents, including Polaris and Percuflex stents. Study stents had distal 6Fr pigtail ends with 3Fr or less loops. Decreased material in situ was hypothesized to enhance comfort. Usefulness of the patient self-administered Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (Stone Management Unit, Southmead Hospital, United Kingdom) was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 4-arm multicenter study enrolled adults requiring retrograde unilateral ureteral stent placement for 4 to 28 days. Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire administration was done before placement (baseline), on day 4 after placement and on day 30 after removal. A total of 236 patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the short loop tail stent (60), the long loop tail stent (59), the Percuflex Plus stent (64) and the Polaris stent (53). RESULTS: Overall pain worsened from baseline to day 4 and improved from days 4 to 30. Mean pain medication use peaked for all stents on day 1 after placement. Common device related symptoms were mild or moderate in severity, including flank pain in 47 patients, hematuria in 39, dysuria in 34, frequent urination in 30 and urinary urgency in 27. Six patients experienced a total of 9 device related adverse events requiring hospitalization. All adverse events resolved, including most within 3 days of inpatient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although it was not statistically significant, patients stented with the short loop tail had lower questionnaire pain scores on day 4 after placement and lower pain medication use on day 1 after placement when pain peaked in all stent groups, suggesting that ureteral stent comfort, especially pain, may be improved by less material in situ. The Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire may be better suited for longer term comparisons in stented vs nonstented patients, rather than in this short-term ureteral stent trial.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Urol

DOI

EISSN

1527-3792

Publication Date

June 2009

Volume

181

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2581 / 2587

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Ureter
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Stents
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pain
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lingeman, J. E., Preminger, G. M., Goldfischer, E. R., Krambeck, A. E., & Comfort Study Team, . (2009). Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort. J Urol, 181(6), 2581–2587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019
Lingeman, James E., Glenn M. Preminger, Evan R. Goldfischer, Amy E. Krambeck, and Amy E. Comfort Study Team. “Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.J Urol 181, no. 6 (June 2009): 2581–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019.
Lingeman JE, Preminger GM, Goldfischer ER, Krambeck AE, Comfort Study Team. Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort. J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2581–7.
Lingeman, James E., et al. “Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.J Urol, vol. 181, no. 6, June 2009, pp. 2581–87. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019.
Lingeman JE, Preminger GM, Goldfischer ER, Krambeck AE, Comfort Study Team. Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort. J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2581–2587.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Urol

DOI

EISSN

1527-3792

Publication Date

June 2009

Volume

181

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2581 / 2587

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Ureter
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Stents
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pain