Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies.
Publication
, Journal Article
Hasselblad, V
Published in: Med Decis Making
1998
Studies comparing more than two competing therapies are common in several fields, but standard meta-analytic methods can make only pairwise comparisons. The methods proposed in this article, a generalization of current meta-analytic methods, allow for any number of competing therapies and include both fixed- and random-effects models.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Med Decis Making
DOI
ISSN
0272-989X
Publication Date
1998
Volume
18
Issue
1
Start / End Page
37 / 43
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Smoking Cessation
- Research Design
- Regression Analysis
- Psychotherapy
- Odds Ratio
- Migraine Disorders
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Logistic Models
- Humans
- Heparin
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hasselblad, V. (1998). Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies. Med Decis Making, 18(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9801800110
Hasselblad, V. “Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies.” Med Decis Making 18, no. 1 (1998): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9801800110.
Hasselblad V. Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies. Med Decis Making. 1998;18(1):37–43.
Hasselblad, V. “Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies.” Med Decis Making, vol. 18, no. 1, 1998, pp. 37–43. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/0272989X9801800110.
Hasselblad V. Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies. Med Decis Making. 1998;18(1):37–43.
Published In
Med Decis Making
DOI
ISSN
0272-989X
Publication Date
1998
Volume
18
Issue
1
Start / End Page
37 / 43
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Smoking Cessation
- Research Design
- Regression Analysis
- Psychotherapy
- Odds Ratio
- Migraine Disorders
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Logistic Models
- Humans
- Heparin