Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Yanovitch, T; Wallace, DK; Freedman, SF; Enyedi, LB; Kishnani, P; Worley, G; Crissman, B; Burner, E; Young, TL
Published in: J AAPOS
December 2010

BACKGROUND: Children with Down syndrome (DS) have an increased prevalence of ocular disorders, including amblyopia, strabismus, and refractive error. Health maintenance guidelines from the Down Syndrome Medical Interest Group recommend ophthalmologic examinations every 1 to 2 years for these children. Photoscreening may be a cost-effective option for subsequent screening evaluations after an initial complete examination, but no study has evaluated the accuracy of photoscreening in children with DS. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of photoscreening in detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with DS. METHODS: Photoscreening and complete ophthalmologic evaluations were performed in 50 consecutive 3- to 10-year-old children with DS. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated with the use of ophthalmologic examination findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: Most children were able to complete photoscreening (94% with Medical Technology and Innovations [MTI] and 90% with Visiscreen OSS-C [VR]). Many children had an identified diagnosis on ophthalmologic examination (n = 46, 92%). Of these, approximately one-half (n = 27, 54%) had one or more condition(s) requiring treatment. Both the MTI and VR photoscreening devices had a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.99) for detecting treatable ocular conditions. The specificities for the MTI and VR photoscreening were 0.35 (0.18-0.57) and 0.55 (0.34-0.74), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Photoscreening is sensitive but less specific at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with DS. In specific instances, the use of photoscreening in the DS population has the potential to save time and expense related to routine eye examinations, particularly in children with a normal baseline comprehensive examination.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J AAPOS

DOI

EISSN

1528-3933

Publication Date

December 2010

Volume

14

Issue

6

Start / End Page

472 / 477

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vision Screening
  • Vision Disorders
  • Strabismus
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Refractive Errors
  • Prevalence
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Yanovitch, T., Wallace, D. K., Freedman, S. F., Enyedi, L. B., Kishnani, P., Worley, G., … Young, T. L. (2010). The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome. J AAPOS, 14(6), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.09.016
Yanovitch, Tammy, David K. Wallace, Sharon F. Freedman, Laura B. Enyedi, Priya Kishnani, Gordon Worley, Blythe Crissman, Erica Burner, and Terri L. Young. “The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome.J AAPOS 14, no. 6 (December 2010): 472–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.09.016.
Yanovitch T, Wallace DK, Freedman SF, Enyedi LB, Kishnani P, Worley G, et al. The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome. J AAPOS. 2010 Dec;14(6):472–7.
Yanovitch, Tammy, et al. “The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome.J AAPOS, vol. 14, no. 6, Dec. 2010, pp. 472–77. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.09.016.
Yanovitch T, Wallace DK, Freedman SF, Enyedi LB, Kishnani P, Worley G, Crissman B, Burner E, Young TL. The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome. J AAPOS. 2010 Dec;14(6):472–477.
Journal cover image

Published In

J AAPOS

DOI

EISSN

1528-3933

Publication Date

December 2010

Volume

14

Issue

6

Start / End Page

472 / 477

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vision Screening
  • Vision Disorders
  • Strabismus
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Refractive Errors
  • Prevalence
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Male