Skip to main content
Journal cover image

How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lloyd, JC; Spano, SM; Ross, SS; Wiener, JS; Routh, JC
Published in: J Urol
November 2012

PURPOSE: Definitions of continence following surgery in children with exstrophy-epispadias complex vary widely. We assessed the most common definitions of continence and evaluated the clinical significance of usage patterns for those definitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (2000 to 2011) for English language reports describing postoperative continence outcomes in children with exstrophy-epispadias complex. Articles were evaluated and data were abstracted by 2 reviewers. We assessed patient level factors such as age, preoperative diagnoses and use of additional therapies, as well as study level factors such as continence definition(s), country of origin and method of data collection. RESULTS: We identified 884 articles, of which 87 met inclusion criteria. In total these studies included continence outcomes data on 2,681 patients (57% male). Only 59 studies (68%) clearly defined the term "continence." The most common definition of continence was dry with voiding/catheterization every 3 hours (used in 23 studies, or 39%, defining continence). There was no association between publication date (p = 0.17), study location (p = 0.47) or study size (p = 0.81) and continence definition. There was a trend toward improved reporting of methods for continence ascertainment in more recent years (p = 0.02). Of the 2,681 children included 1,372 (51%) were dry by the definition used in their study. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent definition of continence was "dryness with voiding or catheterization at 3-hour intervals." However, definitions were highly variable and many authors did not define continence at all. To better define outcomes, we recommend that a standardized definition of continence be established and used in future reports.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Urol

DOI

EISSN

1527-3792

Publication Date

November 2012

Volume

188

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1900 / 1904

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Terminology as Topic
  • Male
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Epispadias
  • Child, Preschool
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lloyd, J. C., Spano, S. M., Ross, S. S., Wiener, J. S., & Routh, J. C. (2012). How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature. J Urol, 188(5), 1900–1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.017
Lloyd, Jessica C., Shannon M. Spano, Sherry S. Ross, John S. Wiener, and Jonathan C. Routh. “How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature.J Urol 188, no. 5 (November 2012): 1900–1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.017.
Lloyd JC, Spano SM, Ross SS, Wiener JS, Routh JC. How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature. J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1900–4.
Lloyd, Jessica C., et al. “How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature.J Urol, vol. 188, no. 5, Nov. 2012, pp. 1900–04. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.017.
Lloyd JC, Spano SM, Ross SS, Wiener JS, Routh JC. How dry is dry? A review of definitions of continence in the contemporary exstrophy/epispadias literature. J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1900–1904.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Urol

DOI

EISSN

1527-3792

Publication Date

November 2012

Volume

188

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1900 / 1904

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Terminology as Topic
  • Male
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Epispadias
  • Child, Preschool