Skip to main content

Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sinnott-Armstrong, W; Miller, FG
Published in: Journal of medical ethics
January 2013

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of medical ethics

DOI

EISSN

1473-4257

ISSN

0306-6800

Publication Date

January 2013

Volume

39

Issue

1

Start / End Page

12 / 14

Related Subject Headings

  • Value of Life
  • Tissue and Organ Harvesting
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Humans
  • Homicide
  • Disabled Persons
  • Death
  • Brain Death
  • Applied Ethics
  • Animals
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Miller, F. G. (2013). Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(1), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100948
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, and Franklin G. Miller. “Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics.Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no. 1 (January 2013): 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100948.
Sinnott-Armstrong W, Miller FG. Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics. Journal of medical ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):12–4.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, and Franklin G. Miller. “Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics.Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 12–14. Epmc, doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100948.
Sinnott-Armstrong W, Miller FG. Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics. Journal of medical ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):12–14.

Published In

Journal of medical ethics

DOI

EISSN

1473-4257

ISSN

0306-6800

Publication Date

January 2013

Volume

39

Issue

1

Start / End Page

12 / 14

Related Subject Headings

  • Value of Life
  • Tissue and Organ Harvesting
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Humans
  • Homicide
  • Disabled Persons
  • Death
  • Brain Death
  • Applied Ethics
  • Animals