Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Clark, JS; Lewis, M; McLachlan, JS; HilleRisLambers, J
Published in: Ecology
January 1, 2003

Recent literature on plant population spread advocates quantification of long-distance dispersal (LDD). These estimates could provide insights into rates of migration in response to climate change and rates of alien invasions. LDD information is not available for parameterization of current models because it is hard to obtain. We combine a new stochastic model with a flexible framework that permits assimilation of evidence that might be derived from a range of sources. Results are consistent with the prediction of traditional diffusion that population spread has a finite asymptotic velocity. Unlike traditional diffusion, spread is not well described by the mean; it is erratic. In contrast with deterministic models, our results show that inherent uncertainty, rather than parameter sensitivity, thwarts informative forecasts of spread velocity. Analysis shows that, because LDD is inherently unpredictable, even full knowledge of LDD parameters might not provide informative estimates of velocity for populations characterized by LDD. Although predictive distributions are too broad to provide precise estimates of spread rate, they are valuable for comparing spread potential among species and for identifying potential for invasion. Using combinations of dispersal data and the estimates provided by dispersal biologists that derive from multiple sources, the model predicts spread rates that are much slower than those from traditional (deterministic) fat-tailed models and from simulation models of spread, but for different reasons. Deterministic fat-tailed models overestimate spread rate, because they assume that fractions of individuals can rapidly occupy distant sites. Stochastic models recognize that distant colonization is limited to discrete individuals. Stochastic simulations of plant migration overestimate migration of trees, because they typically assume values of R 0 that are too large.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ecology

DOI

ISSN

0012-9658

Publication Date

January 1, 2003

Volume

84

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1979 / 1988

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0603 Evolutionary Biology
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0501 Ecological Applications
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Clark, J. S., Lewis, M., McLachlan, J. S., & HilleRisLambers, J. (2003). Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? Ecology, 84(8), 1979–1988. https://doi.org/10.1890/01-0618
Clark, J. S., M. Lewis, J. S. McLachlan, and J. HilleRisLambers. “Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well?Ecology 84, no. 8 (January 1, 2003): 1979–88. https://doi.org/10.1890/01-0618.
Clark JS, Lewis M, McLachlan JS, HilleRisLambers J. Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? Ecology. 2003 Jan 1;84(8):1979–88.
Clark, J. S., et al. “Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well?Ecology, vol. 84, no. 8, Jan. 2003, pp. 1979–88. Scopus, doi:10.1890/01-0618.
Clark JS, Lewis M, McLachlan JS, HilleRisLambers J. Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? Ecology. 2003 Jan 1;84(8):1979–1988.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ecology

DOI

ISSN

0012-9658

Publication Date

January 1, 2003

Volume

84

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1979 / 1988

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0603 Evolutionary Biology
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0501 Ecological Applications