Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Does predation contribute to tree diversity?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Beckage, B; Clark, JS
Published in: Oecologia
April 2005

Seed and seedling predation may differentially affect competitively superior tree species to increase the relative recruitment success of poor competitors and contribute to the coexistence of tree species. We examined the effect of seed and seedling predation on the seedling recruitment of three tree species, Acer rubrum (red maple), Liriodendron tulipifera (yellow poplar), and Quercus rubra (northern red oak), over three years by manipulating seed and seedling exposure to predators under contrasting microsite conditions of shrub cover, leaf litter, and overstory canopy. Species rankings of seedling emergence were constant across microsites, regardless of exposure to seed predators, but varied across years. A. rubrum had the highest emergence probabilities across microsites in 1997, but Q. rubra had the highest emergence probabilities in 1999. Predators decreased seedling survival uniformly across species, but did not affect relative growth rates (RGRs). Q. rubra had the highest seedling survivorship across microsites, while L. tulipifera had the highest RGRs. Our results suggest that annual variability in recruitment success contributes more to seedling diversity than differential predation across microsites. We synthesized our results from separate seedling emergence and survival experiments to project seedling bank composition. With equal fecundity assumed across species, Q. rubra dominated the seedling bank, capturing 90% of the regeneration sites on average, followed by A. rubrum (8% of sites) and L. tulipifera (2% of sites). When seed abundance was weighted by species-specific fecundity, seedling bank composition was more diverse; L. tulipifera captured 62% of the regeneration sites, followed by A. rubrum (21% of sites) and Q. rubra (17% of sites). Tradeoffs between seedling performance and fecundity may promote the diversity of seedling regeneration by increasing the probability of inferior competitors capturing regeneration sites.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Oecologia

DOI

EISSN

1432-1939

ISSN

0029-8549

Publication Date

April 2005

Volume

143

Issue

3

Start / End Page

458 / 469

Related Subject Headings

  • Trees
  • Species Specificity
  • Seeds
  • North Carolina
  • Linear Models
  • Food Chain
  • Fertility
  • Environment
  • Ecosystem
  • Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Beckage, B., & Clark, J. S. (2005). Does predation contribute to tree diversity? Oecologia, 143(3), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1815-9
Beckage, Brian, and James S. Clark. “Does predation contribute to tree diversity?Oecologia 143, no. 3 (April 2005): 458–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1815-9.
Beckage B, Clark JS. Does predation contribute to tree diversity? Oecologia. 2005 Apr;143(3):458–69.
Beckage, Brian, and James S. Clark. “Does predation contribute to tree diversity?Oecologia, vol. 143, no. 3, Apr. 2005, pp. 458–69. Epmc, doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1815-9.
Beckage B, Clark JS. Does predation contribute to tree diversity? Oecologia. 2005 Apr;143(3):458–469.
Journal cover image

Published In

Oecologia

DOI

EISSN

1432-1939

ISSN

0029-8549

Publication Date

April 2005

Volume

143

Issue

3

Start / End Page

458 / 469

Related Subject Headings

  • Trees
  • Species Specificity
  • Seeds
  • North Carolina
  • Linear Models
  • Food Chain
  • Fertility
  • Environment
  • Ecosystem
  • Ecology