Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Coeytaux, RR; Frasier, PY; Reid, A
Published in: Headache
April 2007

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical outcomes that headache sufferers consider meaningful. BACKGROUND: Several standardized instruments have been developed to assess the severity of headaches and the impact of headaches on an individual's quality of life. To our knowledge, however, little research has been conducted to determine which of these many clinical endpoints are considered by headache sufferers themselves to be most important. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus groups with patients with frequent headaches who had recently participated in a randomized clinical trial. Subjects were informed that the purpose of the focus groups was to help healthcare providers learn how to better recognize if their patients' headache conditions improved or worsened over time. RESULTS: Five salient topics emerged from the discussions: (1) severity of pain associated with headaches; (2) definition of meaningful symptom relief; (3) uncertainty regarding timing and severity of headaches; (4) devaluation of the impact of headaches on sufferers; and (5) assessments of pain. Participants stated unambiguously that headache pain is one of the most important aspects of their headache experience. Each of the 4 groups agreed that an increase in the number of pain-free days would be meaningful. Participants also reported that daily headache diaries are not overly burdensome to complete and that the diaries helped them identify useful trends over time. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that severity and frequency of headache pain are important clinical outcomes from patients' perspective, and that headache diaries are a feasible and useful method of assessing meaningful clinical change over time. Although standardized questionnaires that assess functional status, disability, or health-related quality of life may help quantify patients' response to treatment for frequent headaches, participants in this study did not consider such questionnaires particularly informative. Further research is needed to validate headache diaries among patients with headache in the primary care setting.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Headache

DOI

ISSN

0017-8748

Publication Date

April 2007

Volume

47

Issue

4

Start / End Page

480 / 485

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pain Measurement
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Humans
  • Headache Disorders
  • Follow-Up Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Coeytaux, R. R., Frasier, P. Y., & Reid, A. (2007). Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches. Headache, 47(4), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00753.x
Coeytaux, Remy R., Pamela Y. Frasier, and Alfred Reid. “Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches.Headache 47, no. 4 (April 2007): 480–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00753.x.
Coeytaux RR, Frasier PY, Reid A. Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches. Headache. 2007 Apr;47(4):480–5.
Coeytaux, Remy R., et al. “Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches.Headache, vol. 47, no. 4, Apr. 2007, pp. 480–85. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00753.x.
Coeytaux RR, Frasier PY, Reid A. Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches. Headache. 2007 Apr;47(4):480–485.
Journal cover image

Published In

Headache

DOI

ISSN

0017-8748

Publication Date

April 2007

Volume

47

Issue

4

Start / End Page

480 / 485

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pain Measurement
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Humans
  • Headache Disorders
  • Follow-Up Studies