Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pires, LA; Lehmann, MH; Buxton, AE; Hafley, GE; Lee, KL; Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators,
Published in: J Am Coll Cardiol
October 2001

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the influence of the clinical setting (in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital) in which nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is discovered on the rate of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), arrhythmic events and survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. BACKGROUND: In-hospital presentation of sustained VT is independently associated with lower long-term overall survival. The impact of the clinical setting in which NSVT is documented is unknown. METHODS: In the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), designed to assess the benefit of randomized antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing in patients with asymptomatic NSVT, CAD and LV dysfunction, eligible patients were enrolled irrespective of the setting in which the index arrhythmia was discovered. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the rate of VT inducibility and outcome of MUSTT-enrolled patients with in-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of NSVT. RESULTS: Monomorphic sustained VT was induced in 35% and 28% of the patients whose index NSVT occurred in-hospital and out-of-hospital, respectively (adjusted p = 0.006). Cardiac arrest or death due to arrhythmia at two- and five-year follow-ups were 14% and 28% for untreated patients with in-hospital-identified NSVT and 11% and 21% for the out-of-hospital group (adjusted p = 0.10). Overall mortality rates at two- and five-year follow-ups were 24% and 48% for inpatients and 18% and 38% for outpatients (adjusted p = 0.018). In patients randomized to antiarrhythmic therapy, there was no significant interaction between patient status (in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital) and treatment impact on the rates of total mortality (p = 0.98) and arrhythmic events (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CAD and impaired LV function, asymptomatic NSVT identified in-hospital, compared with that identified out-of-hospital, is associated with a higher rate of induction of sustained VT and overall mortality. Therefore, in similar patients, the clinical setting in which NSVT is discovered should be taken into account when formulating patient risk, treatment and clinical trial design.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

October 2001

Volume

38

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1156 / 1162

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prognosis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pires, L. A., Lehmann, M. H., Buxton, A. E., Hafley, G. E., Lee, K. L., & Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators, . (2001). Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications. J Am Coll Cardiol, 38(4), 1156–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01482-6
Pires, L. A., M. H. Lehmann, A. E. Buxton, G. E. Hafley, K. L. Lee, and K. L. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. “Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications.J Am Coll Cardiol 38, no. 4 (October 2001): 1156–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01482-6.
Pires LA, Lehmann MH, Buxton AE, Hafley GE, Lee KL, Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Oct;38(4):1156–62.
Pires LA, Lehmann MH, Buxton AE, Hafley GE, Lee KL, Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Oct;38(4):1156–1162.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

October 2001

Volume

38

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1156 / 1162

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prognosis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans