Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Su, SS; Lahue, RS; Au, KG; Modrich, P
Published in: J Biol Chem
May 15, 1988

To evaluate the substrate specificity of methyl-directed mismatch repair in Escherichia coli extracts, we have constructed a set of DNA heteroduplexes, each of which contains one of the eight possible single base pair mismatches and a single hemimethylated d(GATC) site. Although all eight mismatches were located at the same position within heteroduplex molecules and were embedded within the same sequence environment, they were not corrected with equal efficiencies in vitro. G-T was corrected most efficiently, with A-C, C-T, A-A, T-T, and G-G being repaired at rates 40-80% of that of the G-T mispair. Correction of each of these six mispairs occurred in a methyl-directed manner in a reaction requiring mutH, mutL, and mutS gene products. C-C and A-G mismatches showed different behavior. C-C was an extremely poor substrate for correction while repair of A-G was anomalous. Although A-G was corrected to A-T by the mutHLS-dependent, methyl-directed pathway, repair of A-G to C-G occurred largely by a pathway that is independent of the methylation state of the heteroduplex and which does not require mutH, mutL, or mutS gene products. Similar results were obtained with a second A-G mismatch in a different sequence environment suggesting that a novel pathway may exist for processing A-G mispairs to C-G base pairs. As judged by DNase I footprint analysis, MutS protein is capable of recognizing each of the eight possible base-base mismatches. Use of this method to estimate the apparent affinity of MutS protein for each of the mispairs revealed a rough correlation between MutS affinity and efficiency of correction by the methyl-directed pathway. However, the A-C mismatch was an exception in this respect indicating that interactions other than mismatch recognition may contribute to the efficiency of repair.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Biol Chem

ISSN

0021-9258

Publication Date

May 15, 1988

Volume

263

Issue

14

Start / End Page

6829 / 6835

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nucleic Acid Heteroduplexes
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Methylation
  • Escherichia coli
  • Deoxyribonuclease I
  • DNA, Bacterial
  • DNA Restriction Enzymes
  • DNA Repair
  • Coliphages
  • Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Su, S. S., Lahue, R. S., Au, K. G., & Modrich, P. (1988). Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro. J Biol Chem, 263(14), 6829–6835.
Su, S. S., R. S. Lahue, K. G. Au, and P. Modrich. “Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro.J Biol Chem 263, no. 14 (May 15, 1988): 6829–35.
Su SS, Lahue RS, Au KG, Modrich P. Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 15;263(14):6829–35.
Su, S. S., et al. “Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro.J Biol Chem, vol. 263, no. 14, May 1988, pp. 6829–35.
Su SS, Lahue RS, Au KG, Modrich P. Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 15;263(14):6829–6835.

Published In

J Biol Chem

ISSN

0021-9258

Publication Date

May 15, 1988

Volume

263

Issue

14

Start / End Page

6829 / 6835

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nucleic Acid Heteroduplexes
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Methylation
  • Escherichia coli
  • Deoxyribonuclease I
  • DNA, Bacterial
  • DNA Restriction Enzymes
  • DNA Repair
  • Coliphages
  • Biochemistry & Molecular Biology