A test can be reproducible but still not useful
Publication
, Journal Article
Myers, ER
Published in: Fertility and Sterility
January 1, 2004
Good correlation between pathologists in assigning dates to endometrial biopsy specimens did not translate into good agreement in the dichotomous diagnosis of in-phase or out-of-phase. Design and analysis of reproducibility studies is complex; although alternative approaches are certainly reasonable, we believe it unlikely that they would have changed our fundamental conclusion. © 2004 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Fertility and Sterility
DOI
ISSN
0015-0282
Publication Date
January 1, 2004
Volume
82
Issue
5
Start / End Page
1299
Related Subject Headings
- Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
- 3215 Reproductive medicine
- 1117 Public Health and Health Services
- 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Myers, E. R. (2004). A test can be reproducible but still not useful. Fertility and Sterility, 82(5), 1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.931
Myers, E. R. “A test can be reproducible but still not useful.” Fertility and Sterility 82, no. 5 (January 1, 2004): 1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.931.
Myers ER. A test can be reproducible but still not useful. Fertility and Sterility. 2004 Jan 1;82(5):1299.
Myers, E. R. “A test can be reproducible but still not useful.” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 5, Jan. 2004, p. 1299. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.931.
Myers ER. A test can be reproducible but still not useful. Fertility and Sterility. 2004 Jan 1;82(5):1299.
Published In
Fertility and Sterility
DOI
ISSN
0015-0282
Publication Date
January 1, 2004
Volume
82
Issue
5
Start / End Page
1299
Related Subject Headings
- Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
- 3215 Reproductive medicine
- 1117 Public Health and Health Services
- 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
- 1103 Clinical Sciences