Skip to main content

Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cohen, TD; Preminger, GM
Published in: Current Opinion in Urology
January 1, 1996

The introduction of shock-wave lithotripsy has radically changed the treatment strategy for the management of most renal calculi. However, many stones cannot be treated effectively with this form of lithotripsy, and are best managed with percutaneous procedures. Although shock-wave lithotripsy is the least invasive form of stone management, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy remains the treatment of choice for several forms of stone disease including: large stones, many cystine and struvite calculi, lower pole calyceal calculi, stones associated with anomalous renal anatomy, and stones in morbidly obese patients.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Current Opinion in Urology

DOI

ISSN

0963-0643

Publication Date

January 1, 1996

Volume

6

Issue

4

Start / End Page

213 / 217

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cohen, T. D., & Preminger, G. M. (1996). Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy? Current Opinion in Urology, 6(4), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042307-199607000-00010
Cohen, T. D., and G. M. Preminger. “Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy?Current Opinion in Urology 6, no. 4 (January 1, 1996): 213–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042307-199607000-00010.
Cohen TD, Preminger GM. Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy? Current Opinion in Urology. 1996 Jan 1;6(4):213–7.
Cohen, T. D., and G. M. Preminger. “Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy?Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 6, no. 4, Jan. 1996, pp. 213–17. Scopus, doi:10.1097/00042307-199607000-00010.
Cohen TD, Preminger GM. Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy? Current Opinion in Urology. 1996 Jan 1;6(4):213–217.

Published In

Current Opinion in Urology

DOI

ISSN

0963-0643

Publication Date

January 1, 1996

Volume

6

Issue

4

Start / End Page

213 / 217

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services