Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ubel, PA; Jepson, C; Baron, J
Published in: Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
January 2001

Decision aids often provide statistical information and patient testimonials to guide treatment choices. This raises the possibility that the testimonials will overwhelm the statistical information.Prospective jurors in Philadelphia County were presented with hypothetical statistical information about the percentage of angina patients who benefit from angioplasty and bypass surgery (50% and 75%, respectively). They were also given written testimonials from hypothetical patients who had benefited or not benefited from each of the two treatments. The numbers of patients benefiting and not benefiting were varied to be either proportionate to the statistical information or disproportionate. In study 1, all participants received 1 testimonial from a patient who had benefited from angioplasty and 1 from a patient who had not. Participants receiving the proportionate questionnaire version were also given 3 testimonials from patients who benefited from bypass surgery and 1 from a patient who did not, coinciding with the hypothetical statistical information. In contrast, participants receiving the disproportionate questionnaire version received only 1 testimonial from a patient who benefited from surgery and 1 from a patient who did not. In study 2, all participants received 2 examples of patients who benefited from angioplasty and 2 who did not. Participants with the proportionate questionnaire version received the same testimonials regarding surgery as in study 1. Those receiving the disproportionate questionnaire version received 2 testimonials from patients who benefited from bypass and 2 from patients who did not. Finally, a separate set of participants in study 2 received a questionnaire with no testimonials.In study 1, 30% of participants receiving the disproportionate questionnaire version chose bypass surgery versus 44% of those receiving the proportionate questionnaire (P = 0.002 by chi2). In study 2, 34% of participants receiving the disproportionate questionnaire version chose bypass surgery versus 37% of those receiving the proportionate questionnaire (P = 0.59 by chi2). Of those receiving no patient testimonials, 58% chose bypass surgery.The inclusion of written patient testimonials significantly influenced hypothetical treatment choices. Efforts to make the mix of positive versus negative testimonials proportionate to statistical information may, under some circumstances, affect choices in ways that cannot automatically be assumed to be optimal.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

DOI

EISSN

1552-681X

ISSN

0272-989X

Publication Date

January 2001

Volume

21

Issue

1

Start / End Page

60 / 68

Related Subject Headings

  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Female
  • Decision Theory
  • Decision Support Techniques
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ubel, P. A., Jepson, C., & Baron, J. (2001). The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices. Medical Decision Making : An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x0102100108
Ubel, P. A., C. Jepson, and J. Baron. “The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices.Medical Decision Making : An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 21, no. 1 (January 2001): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x0102100108.
Ubel PA, Jepson C, Baron J. The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 2001 Jan;21(1):60–8.
Ubel, P. A., et al. “The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices.Medical Decision Making : An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, vol. 21, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 60–68. Epmc, doi:10.1177/0272989x0102100108.
Ubel PA, Jepson C, Baron J. The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 2001 Jan;21(1):60–68.
Journal cover image

Published In

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

DOI

EISSN

1552-681X

ISSN

0272-989X

Publication Date

January 2001

Volume

21

Issue

1

Start / End Page

60 / 68

Related Subject Headings

  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Female
  • Decision Theory
  • Decision Support Techniques