Skip to main content

The euthanasia debate and empirical evidence: separating burdens to others from one's own quality of life.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ubel, PA; Arnold, RM
Published in: The Journal of clinical ethics
January 1994

Duke Scholars

Published In

The Journal of clinical ethics

EISSN

1945-5879

ISSN

1046-7890

Publication Date

January 1994

Volume

5

Issue

2

Start / End Page

155 / 158

Related Subject Headings

  • Wedge Argument
  • Value of Life
  • Suicide, Assisted
  • Quality of Life
  • Humans
  • Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
  • Euthanasia
  • Ethics, Medical
  • Empirical Research
  • Applied Ethics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ubel, P. A., & Arnold, R. M. (1994). The euthanasia debate and empirical evidence: separating burdens to others from one's own quality of life. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5(2), 155–158.
Ubel, P. A., and R. M. Arnold. “The euthanasia debate and empirical evidence: separating burdens to others from one's own quality of life.The Journal of Clinical Ethics 5, no. 2 (January 1994): 155–58.
Ubel PA, Arnold RM. The euthanasia debate and empirical evidence: separating burdens to others from one's own quality of life. The Journal of clinical ethics. 1994 Jan;5(2):155–8.
Ubel, P. A., and R. M. Arnold. “The euthanasia debate and empirical evidence: separating burdens to others from one's own quality of life.The Journal of Clinical Ethics, vol. 5, no. 2, Jan. 1994, pp. 155–58.
Ubel PA, Arnold RM. The euthanasia debate and empirical evidence: separating burdens to others from one's own quality of life. The Journal of clinical ethics. 1994 Jan;5(2):155–158.

Published In

The Journal of clinical ethics

EISSN

1945-5879

ISSN

1046-7890

Publication Date

January 1994

Volume

5

Issue

2

Start / End Page

155 / 158

Related Subject Headings

  • Wedge Argument
  • Value of Life
  • Suicide, Assisted
  • Quality of Life
  • Humans
  • Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
  • Euthanasia
  • Ethics, Medical
  • Empirical Research
  • Applied Ethics