Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Modeling of bias for the analysis of receptor signaling in biochemical systems.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Barak, LS; Peterson, S
Published in: Biochemistry
February 14, 2012

Ligand bias is a recently introduced concept in the receptor signaling field that underlies innovative strategies for targeted drug design. Ligands, as a consequence of conformational selectivity, produce signaling bias in which some downstream biochemical pathways are favored over others, and this contributes to variability in physiological responsiveness. Though the concept of bias and its implications for receptor signaling have become more important, its working definition in biochemical signaling is sufficiently imprecise as to impede the use of bias as an analytical tool. In this work, we provide a precise mathematical definition for receptor signaling bias using a formalism expressly applied to logistic response functions, models of most physiological behaviors. We show that signaling-response bias of biological processes may be represented by hyperbolae, or more generally as families of bias coordinates that index hyperbolae. Furthermore, we show bias is a property of a parametric mapping of these indexes into vertical strings that reside within a cylinder of stacked Poincare disks and that bias factors representing signaling probabilities are the radial distance of the strings from the cylinder axis. The utility of the formalism is demonstrated with logistic hyperbolic plots, by transducer ratio modeling, and with novel examples of Poincare disk plots of Gi and β-arrestin biased dopamine 2 receptor signaling. Our results provide a platform for categorizing compounds using distance relationships in the Poincare disk, indicate that signaling bias is a relatively common phenomenon at low ligand concentrations, and suggest that potent partial agonists and signaling pathway modulators may be preferred leads for signal bias-based therapies.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Biochemistry

DOI

EISSN

1520-4995

Publication Date

February 14, 2012

Volume

51

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1114 / 1125

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • beta-Arrestins
  • Signal Transduction
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
  • Receptors, Dopamine D2
  • Quinpirole
  • Protein Conformation
  • Probability
  • Models, Biological
  • Mice
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Barak, L. S., & Peterson, S. (2012). Modeling of bias for the analysis of receptor signaling in biochemical systems. Biochemistry, 51(6), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi201308s
Barak, Larry S., and Sean Peterson. “Modeling of bias for the analysis of receptor signaling in biochemical systems.Biochemistry 51, no. 6 (February 14, 2012): 1114–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi201308s.
Barak LS, Peterson S. Modeling of bias for the analysis of receptor signaling in biochemical systems. Biochemistry. 2012 Feb 14;51(6):1114–25.
Barak, Larry S., and Sean Peterson. “Modeling of bias for the analysis of receptor signaling in biochemical systems.Biochemistry, vol. 51, no. 6, Feb. 2012, pp. 1114–25. Pubmed, doi:10.1021/bi201308s.
Barak LS, Peterson S. Modeling of bias for the analysis of receptor signaling in biochemical systems. Biochemistry. 2012 Feb 14;51(6):1114–1125.
Journal cover image

Published In

Biochemistry

DOI

EISSN

1520-4995

Publication Date

February 14, 2012

Volume

51

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1114 / 1125

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • beta-Arrestins
  • Signal Transduction
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
  • Receptors, Dopamine D2
  • Quinpirole
  • Protein Conformation
  • Probability
  • Models, Biological
  • Mice
  • Humans