Skip to main content

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Steg, PG; James, S; Harrington, RA; Ardissino, D; Becker, RC; Cannon, CP; Emanuelsson, H; Finkelstein, A; Husted, S; Katus, H; Kilhamn, J ...
Published in: Circulation
November 2010

Aspirin and clopidogrel are recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing coronary stenting. Ticagrelor, a reversible oral P2Y12-receptor antagonist, provides faster, greater, and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and may be useful for patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), a randomized, double-blind trial, compared ticagrelor with clopidogrel for the prevention of vascular events in 18 624 ACS patients. This report concerns the 7544 ACS patients with STE or left bundle-branch block allocated to either ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose (with provision for 300 mg clopidogrel at percutaneous coronary intervention) followed by 75 mg daily for 6 to 12 months. The reduction of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (10.8% versus 9.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.01; P=0.07) was consistent with the overall PLATO results. There was no interaction between presentation with STE/left bundle-branch block and randomized treatment (interaction P=0.29). Ticagrelor reduced several secondary end points, including myocardial infarction alone (HR, 0.80; P=0.03), total mortality (HR, 0.82; P=0.05), and definite stent thrombosis (HR, 0.66; P=0.03). The risk of stroke, low in both groups, was higher with ticagrelor (1.7% versus 1.0%; HR,1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.48; P=0.02). Ticagrelor did not affect major bleeding (HR, 0.98; P=0.76).In patients with STE-ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the effects of ticagrelor were consistent with those observed in the overall PLATO trial.URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

ISSN

0009-7322

Publication Date

November 2010

Volume

122

Issue

21

Start / End Page

2131 / 2141

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticlopidine
  • Ticagrelor
  • Risk Factors
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Steg, P. G., James, S., Harrington, R. A., Ardissino, D., Becker, R. C., Cannon, C. P., … PLATO Study Group, . (2010). Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis. Circulation, 122(21), 2131–2141. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.927582
Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Stefan James, Robert A. Harrington, Diego Ardissino, Richard C. Becker, Christopher P. Cannon, Håkan Emanuelsson, et al. “Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis.Circulation 122, no. 21 (November 2010): 2131–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.927582.
Steg PG, James S, Harrington RA, Ardissino D, Becker RC, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Finkelstein A, Husted S, Katus H, Kilhamn J, Olofsson S, Storey RF, Weaver WD, Wallentin L, PLATO Study Group. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis. Circulation. 2010 Nov;122(21):2131–2141.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

ISSN

0009-7322

Publication Date

November 2010

Volume

122

Issue

21

Start / End Page

2131 / 2141

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticlopidine
  • Ticagrelor
  • Risk Factors
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Humans