Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kahaleh, M; Mishra, R; Shami, VM; Northup, PG; Berg, CL; Bashlor, P; Jones, P; Ellen, K; Weiss, GR; Brenin, CM; Kurth, BE; Rich, TA ...
Published in: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
March 2008

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is associated with improvement in cholestasis, quality of life, and potentially survival. We compared survival in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with PDT and stent placement with a group undergoing ERCP with stent placement alone. METHODS: Forty-eight patients were palliated for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma during a 5-year period. Nineteen were treated with PDT and stents; 29 patients treated with biliary stents alone served as a control group. Multivariate analysis was performed by using Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, age, treatment by chemotherapy or radiation, and number of ERCP procedures and PDT sessions to detect predictors of survival. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved survival in the PDT group compared with the stent only group (16.2 vs 7.4 months, P<.004). Mortality in the PDT group at 3, 6, and 12 months was 0%, 16%, and 56%, respectively. The corresponding mortality in the stent group was 28%, 52%, and 82%, respectively. The difference between the 2 groups was significant at 3 months and 6 months but not at 12 months. Only the number of ERCP procedures and number of PDT sessions were significant on multivariate analysis. Adverse events specific to PDT included 3 patients with skin phototoxicity requiring topical therapy only. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP with PDT seems to increase survival in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma when compared with ERCP alone. It remains to be proved whether this effect is attributable to PDT or the number of ERCP sessions. A prospective randomized multicenter study is required to confirm these data.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

DOI

EISSN

1542-7714

Publication Date

March 2008

Volume

6

Issue

3

Start / End Page

290 / 297

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Stents
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Phototherapy
  • Photosensitizing Agents
  • Neoplasm Staging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kahaleh, M., Mishra, R., Shami, V. M., Northup, P. G., Berg, C. L., Bashlor, P., … Yeaton, P. (2008). Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 6(3), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.004
Kahaleh, Michel, Rajnish Mishra, Vanessa M. Shami, Patrick G. Northup, Carl L. Berg, Penny Bashlor, Petra Jones, et al. “Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, no. 3 (March 2008): 290–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.004.
Kahaleh M, Mishra R, Shami VM, Northup PG, Berg CL, Bashlor P, et al. Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Mar;6(3):290–7.
Kahaleh, Michel, et al. “Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, vol. 6, no. 3, Mar. 2008, pp. 290–97. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.004.
Kahaleh M, Mishra R, Shami VM, Northup PG, Berg CL, Bashlor P, Jones P, Ellen K, Weiss GR, Brenin CM, Kurth BE, Rich TA, Adams RB, Yeaton P. Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Mar;6(3):290–297.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

DOI

EISSN

1542-7714

Publication Date

March 2008

Volume

6

Issue

3

Start / End Page

290 / 297

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Stents
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Phototherapy
  • Photosensitizing Agents
  • Neoplasm Staging