Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The importance of being discrete (and spatial)

Publication ,  Journal Article
Durrett, R; Levin, S
Published in: Theoretical Population Biology
January 1, 1994

We consider and compare four approaches to modeling the dynamics of spatially distributed systems: mean field approaches (described by ordinary differential equations) in which every individual is considered to have equal probability of interacting with every other individual; patch models that group discrete individuals into patches without additional spatial structure; reaction-diffusion equations, in which infinitesimal individuals are distributed in space; and interacting particle systems, in which individuals are discrete and space is treated explicitly. We apply these four approaches to three examples of species interactions in spatially distributed populations and compare their predictions. Each represents different assumptions about the biology and hence a comparison among them has biological as well as modeling implications. In the first case all four approaches agree, in the second the spatial models disagree with the nonspatial ones, while in the third the stochastic models with discrete individuals disagree with the ones based on differential equations. We show further that the limiting reaction-diffusion equations associated with particle systems can have different qualitative behavior from those obtained by simply adding diffusion terms to mean field equations. © 1994 Academic Press. All rights reserved.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Theoretical Population Biology

DOI

EISSN

1096-0325

ISSN

0040-5809

Publication Date

January 1, 1994

Volume

46

Issue

3

Start / End Page

363 / 394

Related Subject Headings

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • 4901 Applied mathematics
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0604 Genetics
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0501 Ecological Applications
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Durrett, R., & Levin, S. (1994). The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theoretical Population Biology, 46(3), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1994.1032
Durrett, R., and S. Levin. “The importance of being discrete (and spatial).” Theoretical Population Biology 46, no. 3 (January 1, 1994): 363–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1994.1032.
Durrett R, Levin S. The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theoretical Population Biology. 1994 Jan 1;46(3):363–94.
Durrett, R., and S. Levin. “The importance of being discrete (and spatial).” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 46, no. 3, Jan. 1994, pp. 363–94. Scopus, doi:10.1006/tpbi.1994.1032.
Durrett R, Levin S. The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theoretical Population Biology. 1994 Jan 1;46(3):363–394.
Journal cover image

Published In

Theoretical Population Biology

DOI

EISSN

1096-0325

ISSN

0040-5809

Publication Date

January 1, 1994

Volume

46

Issue

3

Start / End Page

363 / 394

Related Subject Headings

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • 4901 Applied mathematics
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0604 Genetics
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0501 Ecological Applications