Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dunson, DB; Weinberg, CR; Baird, DD; Kesner, JS; Wilcox, AJ
Published in: Statistics in medicine
March 2001

In modelling human fertility one ideally accounts for timing of intercourse relative to ovulation. Measurement error in identifying the day of ovulation can bias estimates of fecundability parameters and attenuate estimates of covariate effects. In the absence of a single perfect marker of ovulation, several error prone markers are sometimes obtained. In this paper we propose a semi-parametric mixture model that uses multiple independent markers of ovulation to account for measurement error. The model assigns each method of assessing ovulation a distinct non-parametric error distribution, and corrects bias in estimates of day-specific fecundability. We use a Monte Carlo EM algorithm for joint estimation of (i) the error distribution for the markers, (ii) the error-corrected fertility parameters, and (iii) the couple-specific random effects. We apply the methods to data from a North Carolina fertility study to assess the magnitude of error in measures of ovulation based on urinary luteinizing hormone and metabolites of ovarian hormones, and estimate the corrected day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Statistics in medicine

DOI

EISSN

1097-0258

ISSN

0277-6715

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

20

Issue

6

Start / End Page

965 / 978

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics & Probability
  • Progesterone
  • Pregnancy
  • Ovulation Detection
  • Ovulation
  • North Carolina
  • Models, Biological
  • Male
  • Luteinizing Hormone
  • Likelihood Functions
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Baird, D. D., Kesner, J. S., & Wilcox, A. J. (2001). Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Statistics in Medicine, 20(6), 965–978. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.716
Dunson, D. B., C. R. Weinberg, D. D. Baird, J. S. Kesner, and A. J. Wilcox. “Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation.Statistics in Medicine 20, no. 6 (March 2001): 965–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.716.
Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Kesner JS, Wilcox AJ. Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Statistics in medicine. 2001 Mar;20(6):965–78.
Dunson, D. B., et al. “Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation.Statistics in Medicine, vol. 20, no. 6, Mar. 2001, pp. 965–78. Epmc, doi:10.1002/sim.716.
Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Kesner JS, Wilcox AJ. Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Statistics in medicine. 2001 Mar;20(6):965–978.
Journal cover image

Published In

Statistics in medicine

DOI

EISSN

1097-0258

ISSN

0277-6715

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

20

Issue

6

Start / End Page

965 / 978

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics & Probability
  • Progesterone
  • Pregnancy
  • Ovulation Detection
  • Ovulation
  • North Carolina
  • Models, Biological
  • Male
  • Luteinizing Hormone
  • Likelihood Functions