Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparative clinical trial of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-dailty dose regimen in uncomplicated hypertensive patients

Publication ,  Journal Article
Singh, AN; Paul, L; Falletta, J
Published in: Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental
January 1, 1981

In a single-factor study of 24 weeks' duration with time sequence of repeated measurement, the optimal therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-daily dose regimens in uncomplicated hypertensive patients was compared. Thirty moderate umcomplicated hypertensive patients with a resting supine diastolic phase-4 pressure below 120 mm Hg and a normal response to a single test dose of 100 mgm metoprolol were selected. Each patient underwent qualitative and quantitative evaluation of cardiac and pulmonary functions at 0, 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 24 weeks. The comparative period was divided in 3 phases according to drug regimen and differences between the two drug schedules were assessed for statistical significances using a single-factor variance/covariance model. Although therapeutically significant reduction and successful control of blood pressure was obtained under both drug regimens, the two schedules of metoprolol administered were significantly different in phase-I systolic and phase-V diastolic blood pressures. The twice-a-day schedules appeared clinically more accurate than once-a-day dosage. The present study thus emphasizes the need of 24-hour beta-adrenoceptor blockade with single-dose regimen for optimal therapeutic control of hypertension. The 24-hour beta-adrenoceptor blockade with single dose can be achieved either by the drug possessing prolonged beta-receptor affinity or with a slow-release formulation. Metoprolol used in this study, had neither prolonged beta-receptor affinity nor a slow-release formulation. Therefore, in conclusion, except for a possible benefit in terms of compliance, the once-a-day schedule of metoprolol does not provide additional interest in therapeutics.

Published In

Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental

ISSN

0011-393X

Publication Date

January 1, 1981

Volume

29

Issue

1 I

Start / End Page

89 / 101

Related Subject Headings

  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy
  • 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Singh, A. N., Paul, L., & Falletta, J. (1981). Comparative clinical trial of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-dailty dose regimen in uncomplicated hypertensive patients. Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental, 29(1 I), 89–101.
Singh, A. N., L. Paul, and J. Falletta. “Comparative clinical trial of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-dailty dose regimen in uncomplicated hypertensive patients.” Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental 29, no. 1 I (January 1, 1981): 89–101.
Singh AN, Paul L, Falletta J. Comparative clinical trial of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-dailty dose regimen in uncomplicated hypertensive patients. Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental. 1981 Jan 1;29(1 I):89–101.
Singh, A. N., et al. “Comparative clinical trial of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-dailty dose regimen in uncomplicated hypertensive patients.” Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental, vol. 29, no. 1 I, Jan. 1981, pp. 89–101.
Singh AN, Paul L, Falletta J. Comparative clinical trial of metoprolol as a single-dose versus twice-dailty dose regimen in uncomplicated hypertensive patients. Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental. 1981 Jan 1;29(1 I):89–101.
Journal cover image

Published In

Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental

ISSN

0011-393X

Publication Date

January 1, 1981

Volume

29

Issue

1 I

Start / End Page

89 / 101

Related Subject Headings

  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy
  • 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences