Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Jewell, EL; Smrtka, M; Broadwater, G; Valea, F; Davis, DM; Nolte, KC; Valea, R; Myers, ER; Samsa, G; Havrilesky, LJ
Published in: Value Health
June 2011

OBJECTIVES: To determine utility scores for health states relevant to the treatment of early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer. METHODS: Seven descriptive health states incorporating the physical and emotional aspects of medical treatment, recovery, and prognosis were developed. Forty-five female volunteers valuated each health state using the visual analogue score (VAS) and time trade off (TTO) methods. Treatment options were ranked by mean and median TTO scores. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine the statistical significance of ranking preferences. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare central tendencies related to age, race, parity, and subject history of abnormal cervical cytology. RESULTS: VAS and TTO scores were highly correlated. Volunteers ranked minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with low-risk features as most preferred (mean TTO = 0.96; median TTO = 1.00) and aborted radical hysterectomy followed by chemoradiation as least preferred (mean TTO = 0.69; median TTO = 0.83). Health states that included radical surgery were ranked higher than those that included chemoradiation, either in the adjuvant or primary setting. When survival was comparable, volunteers rated radical hysterectomy with high-risk pathology followed by adjuvant chemoradiation (mean TTO = 0.78; median TTO = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87) similarly to chemoradiation alone (mean TTO = 0.76; median TTO 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66-0.86; p = NS). Utility scores for the majority of health states were not significantly associated with age, race, parity, or subject history of abnormal cervical cytology. CONCLUSION: Subjects consistently preferred surgical excision to treat early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer and chose a minimally invasive approach. Such utility scores can be used to incorporate quality-of-life effects into comparative-effectiveness models for cervical cancer.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Value Health

DOI

EISSN

1524-4733

Publication Date

June 2011

Volume

14

Issue

4

Start / End Page

582 / 586

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Pilot Projects
  • Patient Preference
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Health Policy & Services
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Jewell, E. L., Smrtka, M., Broadwater, G., Valea, F., Davis, D. M., Nolte, K. C., … Havrilesky, L. J. (2011). Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer. Value Health, 14(4), 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.017
Jewell, Elizabeth L., Michael Smrtka, Gloria Broadwater, Fidel Valea, Debra M. Davis, Kimberly C. Nolte, Renea Valea, Evan R. Myers, Gregory Samsa, and Laura J. Havrilesky. “Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer.Value Health 14, no. 4 (June 2011): 582–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.017.
Jewell EL, Smrtka M, Broadwater G, Valea F, Davis DM, Nolte KC, et al. Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer. Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):582–6.
Jewell, Elizabeth L., et al. “Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer.Value Health, vol. 14, no. 4, June 2011, pp. 582–86. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.017.
Jewell EL, Smrtka M, Broadwater G, Valea F, Davis DM, Nolte KC, Valea R, Myers ER, Samsa G, Havrilesky LJ. Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer. Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):582–586.
Journal cover image

Published In

Value Health

DOI

EISSN

1524-4733

Publication Date

June 2011

Volume

14

Issue

4

Start / End Page

582 / 586

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Pilot Projects
  • Patient Preference
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Health Policy & Services