Skip to main content
Journal cover image

In-vitro modelling of the bactericidal activity of teicoplanin versus flucloxacillin as used in surgical prophylaxis, against Staphylococcus aureus.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Steer, JA; Hill, GB; Robbins, MJ; Newton, JC; Wilson, AP
Published in: J Antimicrob Chemother
April 1997

The bactericidal activities of teicoplanin and flucloxacillin in a 50:50 mixture of human serum and Iso-sensitest broth were compared in an in-vitro pharmacokinetic model, at serum concentrations present during surgical prophylaxis. The bactericidal activity of teicoplanin with and without serum was also compared. Six strains of Staphylococcus aureus were tested. The bactericidal rate of teicoplanin in serum was significantly lower than the rate in broth alone. However, there was no significant difference in the bactericidal rates in serum of teicoplanin compared with flucloxacillin, an antibiotic which is commonly used as prophylaxis for certain surgical procedures.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Antimicrob Chemother

DOI

ISSN

0305-7453

Publication Date

April 1997

Volume

39

Issue

4

Start / End Page

477 / 481

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Teicoplanin
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Staphylococcal Infections
  • Penicillins
  • Microbiology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Methicillin Resistance
  • Humans
  • Floxacillin
  • Culture Media, Serum-Free
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Steer, J. A., Hill, G. B., Robbins, M. J., Newton, J. C., & Wilson, A. P. (1997). In-vitro modelling of the bactericidal activity of teicoplanin versus flucloxacillin as used in surgical prophylaxis, against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother, 39(4), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/39.4.477
Steer, J. A., G. B. Hill, M. J. Robbins, J. C. Newton, and A. P. Wilson. “In-vitro modelling of the bactericidal activity of teicoplanin versus flucloxacillin as used in surgical prophylaxis, against Staphylococcus aureus.J Antimicrob Chemother 39, no. 4 (April 1997): 477–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/39.4.477.
Steer JA, Hill GB, Robbins MJ, Newton JC, Wilson AP. In-vitro modelling of the bactericidal activity of teicoplanin versus flucloxacillin as used in surgical prophylaxis, against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Apr;39(4):477–81.
Steer, J. A., et al. “In-vitro modelling of the bactericidal activity of teicoplanin versus flucloxacillin as used in surgical prophylaxis, against Staphylococcus aureus.J Antimicrob Chemother, vol. 39, no. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 477–81. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/jac/39.4.477.
Steer JA, Hill GB, Robbins MJ, Newton JC, Wilson AP. In-vitro modelling of the bactericidal activity of teicoplanin versus flucloxacillin as used in surgical prophylaxis, against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Apr;39(4):477–481.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Antimicrob Chemother

DOI

ISSN

0305-7453

Publication Date

April 1997

Volume

39

Issue

4

Start / End Page

477 / 481

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Teicoplanin
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Staphylococcal Infections
  • Penicillins
  • Microbiology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Methicillin Resistance
  • Humans
  • Floxacillin
  • Culture Media, Serum-Free