Skip to main content

Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lietz, K; Long, JW; Kfoury, AG; Slaughter, MS; Silver, MA; Milano, CA; Rogers, JG; Naka, Y; Mancini, D; Miller, LW
Published in: Circulation
July 31, 2007

BACKGROUND: The landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial first demonstrated that implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) can provide survival superior to any known medical treatment in patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for transplantation. In the present study, we describe outcomes of DT in the post-REMATCH era in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study included 280 patients who underwent HeartMate XVE LVAD implantation between November 2001 and December 2005. A preoperative risk score for in-hospital mortality after LVAD implantation was established in 222 patients with complete data. All patients were followed up until death or December 2006. The 1-year survival after LVAD implantation was 56%. The in-hospital mortality after LVAD surgery was 27%. The main causes of death included sepsis, right heart failure, and multiorgan failure. The most important determinants of in-hospital mortality were poor nutrition, hematological abnormalities, markers of end-organ or right ventricular dysfunction, and lack of inotropic support. Stratification of DT candidates into low (n=65), medium (n=111), high (n=28), and very high (n=18) risk on the basis of the risk score calculated from these predictors corresponded with 1-year survival rates of 81%, 62%, 28%, and 11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of DT. Patients with advanced heart failure who are referred for DT before major complications of heart failure develop have the best chance of achieving an excellent 1-year survival with LVAD therapy.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

July 31, 2007

Volume

116

Issue

5

Start / End Page

497 / 505

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Survival Rate
  • Survival Analysis
  • Sepsis
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Quality of Life
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lietz, K., Long, J. W., Kfoury, A. G., Slaughter, M. S., Silver, M. A., Milano, C. A., … Miller, L. W. (2007). Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation, 116(5), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972
Lietz, Katherine, James W. Long, Abdallah G. Kfoury, Mark S. Slaughter, Marc A. Silver, Carmelo A. Milano, Joseph G. Rogers, Yoshifumi Naka, Donna Mancini, and Leslie W. Miller. “Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.Circulation 116, no. 5 (July 31, 2007): 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972.
Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Milano CA, et al. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497–505.
Lietz, Katherine, et al. “Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.Circulation, vol. 116, no. 5, July 2007, pp. 497–505. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972.
Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Milano CA, Rogers JG, Naka Y, Mancini D, Miller LW. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497–505.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

July 31, 2007

Volume

116

Issue

5

Start / End Page

497 / 505

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Survival Rate
  • Survival Analysis
  • Sepsis
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Quality of Life