Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Onken, MD; Worley, LA; Char, DH; Augsburger, JJ; Correa, ZM; Nudleman, E; Aaberg, TM; Altaweel, MM; Bardenstein, DS; Finger, PT; Gallie, BL ...
Published in: Ophthalmology
August 2012

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the prognostic performance of a 15 gene expression profiling (GEP) assay that assigns primary posterior uveal melanomas to prognostic subgroups: class 1 (low metastatic risk) and class 2 (high metastatic risk). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 459 patients with posterior uveal melanoma were enrolled from 12 independent centers. TESTING: Tumors were classified by GEP as class 1 or class 2. The first 260 samples were also analyzed for chromosome 3 status using a single nucleotide polymorphism assay. Net reclassification improvement analysis was performed to compare the prognostic accuracy of GEP with the 7th edition clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification and chromosome 3 status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were managed for their primary tumor and monitored for metastasis. RESULTS: The GEP assay successfully classified 446 of 459 cases (97.2%). The GEP was class 1 in 276 cases (61.9%) and class 2 in 170 cases (38.1%). Median follow-up was 17.4 months (mean, 18.0 months). Metastasis was detected in 3 class 1 cases (1.1%) and 44 class 2 cases (25.9%) (log-rank test, P<10(-14)). Although there was an association between GEP class 2 and monosomy 3 (Fisher exact test, P<0.0001), 54 of 260 tumors (20.8%) were discordant for GEP and chromosome 3 status, among which GEP demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). By using multivariate Cox modeling, GEP class had a stronger independent association with metastasis than any other prognostic factor (P<0.0001). Chromosome 3 status did not contribute additional prognostic information that was independent of GEP (P = 0.2). At 3 years follow-up, the net reclassification improvement of GEP over TNM classification was 0.43 (P = 0.001) and 0.38 (P = 0.004) over chromosome 3 status. CONCLUSIONS: The GEP assay had a high technical success rate and was the most accurate prognostic marker among all of the factors analyzed. The GEP provided a highly significant improvement in prognostic accuracy over clinical TNM classification and chromosome 3 status. Chromosome 3 status did not provide prognostic information that was independent of GEP.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ophthalmology

DOI

EISSN

1549-4713

Publication Date

August 2012

Volume

119

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1596 / 1603

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Uveal Neoplasms
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Melanoma
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Onken, M. D., Worley, L. A., Char, D. H., Augsburger, J. J., Correa, Z. M., Nudleman, E., … Harbour, J. W. (2012). Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology, 119(8), 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.017
Onken, Michael D., Lori A. Worley, Devron H. Char, James J. Augsburger, Zelia M. Correa, Eric Nudleman, Thomas M. Aaberg, et al. “Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma.Ophthalmology 119, no. 8 (August 2012): 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.017.
Onken MD, Worley LA, Char DH, Augsburger JJ, Correa ZM, Nudleman E, et al. Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1596–603.
Onken, Michael D., et al. “Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma.Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 8, Aug. 2012, pp. 1596–603. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.017.
Onken MD, Worley LA, Char DH, Augsburger JJ, Correa ZM, Nudleman E, Aaberg TM, Altaweel MM, Bardenstein DS, Finger PT, Gallie BL, Harocopos GJ, Hovland PG, McGowan HD, Milman T, Mruthyunjaya P, Simpson ER, Smith ME, Wilson DJ, Wirostko WJ, Harbour JW. Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1596–1603.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ophthalmology

DOI

EISSN

1549-4713

Publication Date

August 2012

Volume

119

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1596 / 1603

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Uveal Neoplasms
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Melanoma