Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chan, PS; Patel, MR; Klein, LW; Krone, RJ; Dehmer, GJ; Kennedy, K; Nallamothu, BK; Weaver, WD; Masoudi, FA; Rumsfeld, JS; Brindis, RG; Spertus, JA
Published in: JAMA
July 6, 2011

CONTEXT: Despite the widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the appropriateness of these procedures in contemporary practice is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the appropriateness of PCI in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Multicenter, prospective study of patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing PCI between July 1, 2009, and September 30, 2010, at 1091 US hospitals. The appropriateness of PCI was adjudicated using the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization. Results were stratified by whether the procedure was performed for an acute (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina with high-risk features) or nonacute indication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of acute and nonacute PCIs classified as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate; extent of hospital-level variation in inappropriate procedures. RESULTS: Of 500,154 PCIs, 355,417 (71.1%) were for acute indications (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 103,245 [20.6%]; non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105,708 [21.1%]; high-risk unstable angina, 146,464 [29.3%]), and 144,737 (28.9%) for nonacute indications. For acute indications, 350,469 PCIs (98.6%) were classified as appropriate, 1055 (0.3%) as uncertain, and 3893 (1.1%) as inappropriate. For nonacute indications, 72,911 PCIs (50.4%) were classified as appropriate, 54,988 (38.0%) as uncertain, and 16,838 (11.6%) as inappropriate. The majority of inappropriate PCIs for nonacute indications were performed in patients with no angina (53.8%), low-risk ischemia on noninvasive stress testing (71.6%), or suboptimal (≤1 medication) antianginal therapy (95.8%). Furthermore, although variation in the proportion of inappropriate PCI across hospitals was minimal for acute procedures, there was substantial hospital variation for nonacute procedures (median hospital rate for inappropriate PCI, 10.8%; interquartile range, 6.0%-16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary US cohort, nearly all acute PCIs were classified as appropriate. For nonacute indications, however, 12% were classified as inappropriate, with substantial variation across hospitals.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JAMA

DOI

EISSN

1538-3598

Publication Date

July 6, 2011

Volume

306

Issue

1

Start / End Page

53 / 61

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Stents
  • Risk
  • Registries
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Selection
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Myocardial Infarction
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chan, P. S., Patel, M. R., Klein, L. W., Krone, R. J., Dehmer, G. J., Kennedy, K., … Spertus, J. A. (2011). Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA, 306(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.916
Chan, Paul S., Manesh R. Patel, Lloyd W. Klein, Ronald J. Krone, Gregory J. Dehmer, Kevin Kennedy, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, et al. “Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention.JAMA 306, no. 1 (July 6, 2011): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.916.
Chan PS, Patel MR, Klein LW, Krone RJ, Dehmer GJ, Kennedy K, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011 Jul 6;306(1):53–61.
Chan, Paul S., et al. “Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention.JAMA, vol. 306, no. 1, July 2011, pp. 53–61. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/jama.2011.916.
Chan PS, Patel MR, Klein LW, Krone RJ, Dehmer GJ, Kennedy K, Nallamothu BK, Weaver WD, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS, Brindis RG, Spertus JA. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011 Jul 6;306(1):53–61.
Journal cover image

Published In

JAMA

DOI

EISSN

1538-3598

Publication Date

July 6, 2011

Volume

306

Issue

1

Start / End Page

53 / 61

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Stents
  • Risk
  • Registries
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Selection
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Myocardial Infarction