Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Why are angles misperceived?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Nundy, S; Lotto, B; Coppola, D; Shimpi, A; Purves, D
Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
May 2000

Although it has long been apparent that observers tend to overestimate the magnitude of acute angles and underestimate obtuse ones, there is no consensus about why such distortions are seen. Geometrical modeling combined with psychophysical testing of human subjects indicates that these misperceptions are the result of an empirical strategy that resolves the inherent ambiguity of angular stimuli by generating percepts of the past significance of the stimulus rather than the geometry of its retinal projection.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

DOI

EISSN

1091-6490

ISSN

0027-8424

Publication Date

May 2000

Volume

97

Issue

10

Start / End Page

5592 / 5597

Related Subject Headings

  • Retina
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Perception
  • Mathematics
  • Male
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Humans
  • Form Perception
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nundy, S., Lotto, B., Coppola, D., Shimpi, A., & Purves, D. (2000). Why are angles misperceived? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(10), 5592–5597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5592
Nundy, S., B. Lotto, D. Coppola, A. Shimpi, and D. Purves. “Why are angles misperceived?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, no. 10 (May 2000): 5592–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5592.
Nundy S, Lotto B, Coppola D, Shimpi A, Purves D. Why are angles misperceived? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000 May;97(10):5592–7.
Nundy, S., et al. “Why are angles misperceived?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 10, May 2000, pp. 5592–97. Epmc, doi:10.1073/pnas.97.10.5592.
Nundy S, Lotto B, Coppola D, Shimpi A, Purves D. Why are angles misperceived? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000 May;97(10):5592–5597.
Journal cover image

Published In

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

DOI

EISSN

1091-6490

ISSN

0027-8424

Publication Date

May 2000

Volume

97

Issue

10

Start / End Page

5592 / 5597

Related Subject Headings

  • Retina
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Perception
  • Mathematics
  • Male
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Humans
  • Form Perception
  • Female