Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

Potential for lower absorbed dose in digital mammography: A JAFROC experiment using clinical hybrid images with simulated dose reduction

Publication ,  Journal Article
Timberg, P; Ruschin, M; Båth, M; Hemdal, B; Andersson, I; Mattsson, S; Chakraborty, D; Saunders, R; Samei, E; Tingberg, A
Published in: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
June 22, 2006

To determine how image quality linked to tumor detection is affected by reducing the absorbed dose to 50% and 30% of the clinical levels represented by an average glandular dose (AGO) level of 1.3 mGy for a standard breast according to European guidelines. Materials and methods: 90 normal, unprocessed images were acquired from the screening department using a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) unit Mammomat Novation (Siemens). Into 40 of these, one to three simulated tumors were inserted per image at various positions. These tumors represented irregular-shaped malignant masses. Dose reduction was simulated in all 90 images by adding simulated quantum noise to represent images acquired at 50% and 30% of the original dose, resulting in 270 images, which were subsequently processed for final display. Four radiologists participated in a free-response receiver operating characteristics (FROG) study in which they searched for and marked suspicious positions of the masses as well as rated their degree of suspicion of occurrence on a one to four scale. Using the jackknife FROG (JAFROC) method, a score between 0 and 1 (where 1 represents best performance), referred to as a figure-of-merit (FOM), was calculated for each dose level. Results: The FOM was 0.73, 0.70, and 0.68 for the 100%, 50% and 30% dose levels, respectively. Using Analysis of the Variance (ANOVA) to test for statistically significant differences between any two of the three FOMs revealed that they were not statistically distinguishable (p-value of 0.26). Conclusion: For the masses used in this experiment, there was no significant change in detection by increasing quantum noise, thus indicating a potential for dose reduction.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

DOI

ISSN

1605-7422

Publication Date

June 22, 2006

Volume

6146
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Timberg, P., Ruschin, M., Båth, M., Hemdal, B., Andersson, I., Mattsson, S., … Tingberg, A. (2006). Potential for lower absorbed dose in digital mammography: A JAFROC experiment using clinical hybrid images with simulated dose reduction. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, 6146. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.653419
Timberg, P., M. Ruschin, M. Båth, B. Hemdal, I. Andersson, S. Mattsson, D. Chakraborty, R. Saunders, E. Samei, and A. Tingberg. “Potential for lower absorbed dose in digital mammography: A JAFROC experiment using clinical hybrid images with simulated dose reduction.” Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE 6146 (June 22, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.653419.
Timberg P, Ruschin M, Båth M, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Mattsson S, et al. Potential for lower absorbed dose in digital mammography: A JAFROC experiment using clinical hybrid images with simulated dose reduction. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 2006 Jun 22;6146.
Timberg, P., et al. “Potential for lower absorbed dose in digital mammography: A JAFROC experiment using clinical hybrid images with simulated dose reduction.” Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6146, June 2006. Scopus, doi:10.1117/12.653419.
Timberg P, Ruschin M, Båth M, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Mattsson S, Chakraborty D, Saunders R, Samei E, Tingberg A. Potential for lower absorbed dose in digital mammography: A JAFROC experiment using clinical hybrid images with simulated dose reduction. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 2006 Jun 22;6146.

Published In

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

DOI

ISSN

1605-7422

Publication Date

June 22, 2006

Volume

6146