Skip to main content

Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Curtis, S; Stobart, K; Vandermeer, B; Simel, DL; Klassen, T
Published in: Pediatrics
November 2010

CONTEXT: Clinical diagnosis of pediatric meningitis is fundamental; therefore, familiarity with evidence underscoring clinical features suggestive of meningitis is important. OBJECTIVE: To seek evidence supporting accuracy of clinical features of pediatric bacterial meningitis. METHODS: A review of Medline, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and PubMed was conducted for all articles of relevance. Articles contained prospective data of clinical features in children with laboratory-confirmed bacterial meningitis and in comparison groups of those without it. Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data to calculate accuracy data of clinical features. RESULTS: Of 14 145 references initially identified, 10 met our inclusion criteria. On history, a report of bulging fontanel (likelihood ratio [LR]: 8.00 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-26]), neck stiffness (7.70 [3.2-19]), seizures (outside febrile-convulsion age range) (4.40 [3.0-6.4]), or reduced feeds (2.00 [1.2-3.4]) raised concern about the presence of meningitis. On examination, jaundice (LR: 5.90 [95% CI: 1.8-19]), being toxic or moribund (5.80 [3.0-11]), meningeal signs (4.50 [2.4-8.3]), neck stiffness (4.00 [2.6-6.3]), bulging fontanel (3.50 [2.0-6.0]), Kernig sign (3.50 [2.1-5.7]), tone up (3.20 [2.2-4.5]), fever of >40°C (2.90 [1.6-5.5]), and Brudzinski sign (2.50 [1.8-3.6]) independently raised the likelihood of meningitis. The absence of meningeal signs (LR: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.30-0.57]) and an abnormal cry (0.30 [0.16-0.57]) independently lowered the likelihood of meningitis. The absence of fever did not rule out meningitis (LR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.53-0.92]). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for several useful clinical features that influence the likelihood of pediatric meningitis exists. No isolated clinical feature is diagnostic, and the most accurate diagnostic combination is unclear.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Pediatrics

DOI

EISSN

1098-4275

Publication Date

November 2010

Volume

126

Issue

5

Start / End Page

952 / 960

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pediatrics
  • Meningitis, Bacterial
  • Male
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Curtis, S., Stobart, K., Vandermeer, B., Simel, D. L., & Klassen, T. (2010). Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data. Pediatrics, 126(5), 952–960. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0277
Curtis, Sarah, Kent Stobart, Ben Vandermeer, David L. Simel, and Terry Klassen. “Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data.Pediatrics 126, no. 5 (November 2010): 952–60. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0277.
Curtis S, Stobart K, Vandermeer B, Simel DL, Klassen T. Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):952–60.
Curtis, Sarah, et al. “Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data.Pediatrics, vol. 126, no. 5, Nov. 2010, pp. 952–60. Pubmed, doi:10.1542/peds.2010-0277.
Curtis S, Stobart K, Vandermeer B, Simel DL, Klassen T. Clinical features suggestive of meningitis in children: a systematic review of prospective data. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):952–960.

Published In

Pediatrics

DOI

EISSN

1098-4275

Publication Date

November 2010

Volume

126

Issue

5

Start / End Page

952 / 960

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pediatrics
  • Meningitis, Bacterial
  • Male
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evidence-Based Medicine