Skip to main content

Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Perez, KL; Mann, SD; Pachon, JH; Madhav, P; Tornai, MP
Published in: IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)
2010

Attenuation correction is necessary for SPECT quantification. There are a variety of methods to create attenuation maps. For dedicated breast SPECT imaging, it is unclear if either SPECT- or CT-based attenuation map would provide the most accurate quantification and whether or not segmenting the different tissue types will have an effect on the qunatification. For these experiments, 99mTc diluted in methanol and water was filled into geometric and anthropomorphic breast phantoms and was imaged with a dedicated dual-modality SPECT-CT scanner. SPECT images were collected using a compact CZT camera with various 3D acquisitions including vertical and 30° tilted parallel beam, and complex sinusoidal trajectories. CT images were acquired using a quasi-monochromatic x-ray source and CsI(T1) flat panel digital detector in a half-cone beam geometry. Measured scatter correction for SPECT and CT were implemented. To compare photon attenuation correction in the reconstructed SPECT images, various volumetric attenuation matrices were derived from 1) uniform SPECT, 2) uniform CT, and 3) segmented CT, populated with different attenuation coefficient values. Comparisons between attenuation masks using phantoms consisting of materials with different attenuation values show that at 140 keV the differences in the attenuation between materials do not affect the quantification as much as the size and alignment of the attenuation map. The CT-based attenuation maps give quantitative values 30% below the actual value, but are consistent. While the SPECT-based attenuation maps can provide within 10% accurate quantitative values, but are less consistent.

Duke Scholars

Published In

IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)

DOI

ISSN

1095-7863

Publication Date

2010

Volume

2010

Start / End Page

2319 / 2324

Location

United States
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Perez, K. L., Mann, S. D., Pachon, J. H., Madhav, P., & Tornai, M. P. (2010). Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories? IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997), 2010, 2319–2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874198
Perez, Kristy L., Steve D. Mann, Jan H. Pachon, Priti Madhav, and Martin P. Tornai. “Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories?IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997) 2010 (2010): 2319–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874198.
Perez KL, Mann SD, Pachon JH, Madhav P, Tornai MP. Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories? IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2010;2010:2319–24.
Perez, Kristy L., et al. “Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories?IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997), vol. 2010, 2010, pp. 2319–24. Pubmed, doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874198.
Perez KL, Mann SD, Pachon JH, Madhav P, Tornai MP. Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories? IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2010;2010:2319–2324.

Published In

IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)

DOI

ISSN

1095-7863

Publication Date

2010

Volume

2010

Start / End Page

2319 / 2324

Location

United States