Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dillard, AJ; Fagerlin, A; Dal Cin, S; Zikmund-Fisher, BJ; Ubel, PA
Published in: Social science & medicine (1982)
July 2010

Narratives from similar others may be an effective way to increase important health behaviors. In this study, we used a narrative intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening. Researchers have suggested that people may overestimate barriers to colorectal cancer screening. We recruited participants from the US, ages 49-60 who had never previously been screened for colorectal cancer, to read an educational message about screening for the disease. One-half of participants were randomly assigned to also receive a narrative within the message (control participants did not receive a narrative). The narrative intervention was developed according to predictions of affective forecasting theory. Compared to participants who received only the educational message, participants who received the message along with a narrative reported that the barriers to screening would have less of an impact on a future screening experience. The narrative also increased risk perception for colorectal cancer and interest in screening in the next year.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Social science & medicine (1982)

DOI

EISSN

1873-5347

ISSN

0277-9536

Publication Date

July 2010

Volume

71

Issue

1

Start / End Page

45 / 52

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Risk Assessment
  • Public Health
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Narration
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Health Promotion
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dillard, A. J., Fagerlin, A., Dal Cin, S., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2010). Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 71(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038
Dillard, Amanda J., Angela Fagerlin, Sonya Dal Cin, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, and Peter A. Ubel. “Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Social Science & Medicine (1982) 71, no. 1 (July 2010): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038.
Dillard AJ, Fagerlin A, Dal Cin S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social science & medicine (1982). 2010 Jul;71(1):45–52.
Dillard, Amanda J., et al. “Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Social Science & Medicine (1982), vol. 71, no. 1, July 2010, pp. 45–52. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038.
Dillard AJ, Fagerlin A, Dal Cin S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social science & medicine (1982). 2010 Jul;71(1):45–52.
Journal cover image

Published In

Social science & medicine (1982)

DOI

EISSN

1873-5347

ISSN

0277-9536

Publication Date

July 2010

Volume

71

Issue

1

Start / End Page

45 / 52

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Risk Assessment
  • Public Health
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Narration
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Health Promotion