Minimizing Therapeutic Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nondominant ECT.
Publication
, Journal Article
Weiner, RD; Coffey, CE
Published in: Convuls Ther
1986
Conflicting results continue to be reported for studies contrasting the therapeutic efficacy of bilateral and unilateral nondominant electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). At least in part, the therapeutic advantage for bilateral ECT observed by some investigators may be related to the use of nonoptimum unilateral ECT technique. Consideration of technique-related factors, such as stimulus electrode location, contact at the electrode-scalp interface, stimulus dosing, and seizure monitoring, will allow unilateral ECT to be carried out with maximal therapeutic potency.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Convuls Ther
ISSN
0749-8055
Publication Date
1986
Volume
2
Issue
4
Start / End Page
261 / 265
Location
United States
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Weiner, R. D., & Coffey, C. E. (1986). Minimizing Therapeutic Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nondominant ECT. Convuls Ther, 2(4), 261–265.
Weiner, Richard D., and C Edward Coffey. “Minimizing Therapeutic Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nondominant ECT.” Convuls Ther 2, no. 4 (1986): 261–65.
Weiner RD, Coffey CE. Minimizing Therapeutic Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nondominant ECT. Convuls Ther. 1986;2(4):261–5.
Weiner, Richard D., and C. Edward Coffey. “Minimizing Therapeutic Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nondominant ECT.” Convuls Ther, vol. 2, no. 4, 1986, pp. 261–65.
Weiner RD, Coffey CE. Minimizing Therapeutic Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nondominant ECT. Convuls Ther. 1986;2(4):261–265.
Published In
Convuls Ther
ISSN
0749-8055
Publication Date
1986
Volume
2
Issue
4
Start / End Page
261 / 265
Location
United States