Skip to main content

Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Eapen, ZJ; McBroom, AJ; Gray, R; Musty, MD; Hadley, C; Hernandez, AF; Sanders, GD
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
March 1, 2013

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness reviews offer a systematic method to critically appraise existing research and to identify unaddressed clinical areas in cardiovascular disease where significant morbidity, mortality, and variation in the use of resources persist. To delineate and help select areas where comparative effectiveness reviews are needed, the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality involved stakeholders in prioritization of the research agenda. METHODS AND RESULTS: We involved a diverse panel of stakeholders representing a broad range of clinical, policy, and patient perspectives. To assist in prioritization of topics for evidence synthesis, we created a framework evaluating 12 cardiovascular disease subcategories that reflect American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association disease-based guidelines. We performed an environmental scan for each disease subcategory to populate this framework with existing knowledge, levels of evidence, and degrees of public interest. Through a formalized process, 4 disease subcategories were prioritized: chronic coronary artery disease, ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease. Within these subcategories, 11 topics that address the comparative safety and effectiveness of existing treatments and evaluate emerging treatments were nominated by the stakeholder panel to proceed for feasibility assessment before developing comparative effectiveness reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Using a systematic process deriving consensus from multiple stakeholders across cardiovascular disease states, we generated a prioritized list of evidence synthesis topics to inform decision makers. The topics vetted through this process seek to determine the comparative safety and effectiveness of a range of treatments, both established and emerging, and are immediately relevant for prevalent disease states.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

March 1, 2013

Volume

6

Issue

2

Start / End Page

139 / 147

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Prevalence
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Needs Assessment
  • Interdisciplinary Communication
  • Humans
  • Heart Failure
  • Health Priorities
  • Health Care Rationing
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Eapen, Z. J., McBroom, A. J., Gray, R., Musty, M. D., Hadley, C., Hernandez, A. F., & Sanders, G. D. (2013). Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 6(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000046
Eapen, Zubin J., Amanda J. McBroom, Rebecca Gray, Michael D. Musty, Corey Hadley, Adrian F. Hernandez, and Gillian D. Sanders. “Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 6, no. 2 (March 1, 2013): 139–47. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000046.
Eapen ZJ, McBroom AJ, Gray R, Musty MD, Hadley C, Hernandez AF, et al. Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):139–47.
Eapen, Zubin J., et al. “Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, vol. 6, no. 2, Mar. 2013, pp. 139–47. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000046.
Eapen ZJ, McBroom AJ, Gray R, Musty MD, Hadley C, Hernandez AF, Sanders GD. Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):139–147.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

March 1, 2013

Volume

6

Issue

2

Start / End Page

139 / 147

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Prevalence
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Needs Assessment
  • Interdisciplinary Communication
  • Humans
  • Heart Failure
  • Health Priorities
  • Health Care Rationing
  • Evidence-Based Medicine