Skip to main content

Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Solomon, JB; Li, X; Samei, E
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
March 2013

OBJECTIVE: Modern CT systems use surrogates of noise-noise index (NI) and quality reference effective tube current-time product (Q)-to infer the quality of images acquired using tube current modulation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between actual noise and these surrogates for two CT scanners from two different manufacturers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two phantoms (adult and 1-year-old child) were imaged on two CT scanners (64 and 128 MDCT) using a clinical range of NI (6-22) and Q (30-300 mA). Each scan was performed twice, and noise was measured in the mediastinum, lung, and abdomen using an image subtraction technique. The effect on noise from changing other imaging parameters, such as beam collimation, pitch, peak kilovoltage, slice thickness, FOV, reconstruction kernel or algorithm, and patient age category (adult or pediatric), was investigated. RESULTS: On the 64-MDCT scanner, noise increased linearly along with NI, with the slope affected by changing the anatomy of interest, peak kilovoltage, reconstruction algorithm, and convolution kernel. The noise-NI relationship was independent of phantom size, slice thickness, pitch, FOV, and beam width. On the 128-MDCT scanner, noise decreased nonlinearly along with increasing Q, slice thickness, and peak tube voltage. The noise-Q relationship also depended on anatomy of interest, phantom size, age selection, and reconstruction algorithm but was independent of pitch, FOV, and detector configuration. CONCLUSION: We established how noise changes with changing image quality indicators across a clinically relevant range of imaging parameters. This work can aid in optimizing protocols by targeting specific noise levels for different types of CT examinations.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

EISSN

1546-3141

Publication Date

March 2013

Volume

200

Issue

3

Start / End Page

592 / 600

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Male
  • Infant
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Solomon, J. B., Li, X., & Samei, E. (2013). Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 200(3), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8580
Solomon, Justin B., Xiang Li, and Ehsan Samei. “Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.AJR Am J Roentgenol 200, no. 3 (March 2013): 592–600. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8580.
Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):592–600.
Solomon, Justin B., et al. “Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 200, no. 3, Mar. 2013, pp. 592–600. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8580.
Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):592–600.

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

EISSN

1546-3141

Publication Date

March 2013

Volume

200

Issue

3

Start / End Page

592 / 600

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Male
  • Infant