Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: participant recruitment and retention.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brubaker, L; Richter, HE; Barber, MD; Hsu, Y; Rahn, DD; Menefee, S; Visco, A; Spino, C; Martin, S; Meikle, SF
Published in: Int Urogynecol J
January 2013

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We used a focus-group methodology to gather information about women's knowledge and attitudes regarding research participation. METHODS: Two in-person focus groups at seven clinical sites were conducted in women with pelvic floor disorder (PFD): one of women with clinical trial study experience and the other without such experience. One Web-based focus group combining both groups was also conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and five women (average age 58.6 years) participated. Participants in both groups believed that their physicians were the best source of information about clinical trials yet felt that other sources of trial information were important. Financial compensation was not a primary motivating factor for PFD trial enrollment but was, however, cited as an important consideration. Internet collection of data was feasible and provided information comparable with in-person focus groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified central themes guiding successful recruitment to and retention in PFD-related trials and provided insight regarding strategies that may guide future trials.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Int Urogynecol J

DOI

EISSN

1433-3023

Publication Date

January 2013

Volume

24

Issue

1

Start / End Page

73 / 79

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Patient Selection
  • Patient Participation
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Internet
  • Humans
  • Focus Groups
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brubaker, L., Richter, H. E., Barber, M. D., Hsu, Y., Rahn, D. D., Menefee, S., … Meikle, S. F. (2013). Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: participant recruitment and retention. Int Urogynecol J, 24(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x
Brubaker, Linda, Holly E. Richter, Matthew D. Barber, Yvonne Hsu, David D. Rahn, Shawn Menefee, Anthony Visco, Cathie Spino, Susan Martin, and Susan F. Meikle. “Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: participant recruitment and retention.Int Urogynecol J 24, no. 1 (January 2013): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x.
Brubaker L, Richter HE, Barber MD, Hsu Y, Rahn DD, Menefee S, et al. Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: participant recruitment and retention. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jan;24(1):73–9.
Brubaker, Linda, et al. “Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: participant recruitment and retention.Int Urogynecol J, vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 73–79. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x.
Brubaker L, Richter HE, Barber MD, Hsu Y, Rahn DD, Menefee S, Visco A, Spino C, Martin S, Meikle SF. Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: participant recruitment and retention. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jan;24(1):73–79.
Journal cover image

Published In

Int Urogynecol J

DOI

EISSN

1433-3023

Publication Date

January 2013

Volume

24

Issue

1

Start / End Page

73 / 79

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Patient Selection
  • Patient Participation
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Internet
  • Humans
  • Focus Groups