Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing to target PARP inhibitor use in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Secord, AA; Barnett, JC; Ledermann, JA; Peterson, BL; Myers, ER; Havrilesky, LJ
Published in: Int J Gynecol Cancer
June 2013

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine whether use of a PARP inhibitor or (2) BRCA1/2 mutation testing followed by a PARP inhibitor for test positives is potentially cost-effective for maintenance treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: A modified Markov decision analysis compared 3 strategies: (1) observe; (2) olaparib to progression; (3) BRCA1/2 mutation testing; treat mutation carriers with olaparib to progression. Progression-free survival and rates of adverse events were derived from a phase 2 randomized trial. Key assumptions are as follows: (1) 14% of patients harbor a BRCA1/2 mutation; (2) progression-free survival of individuals treated with olaparib is improved for BCRA1/2 carriers compared with noncarriers (estimated hazard ratio, approximately 0.4). Costs derived from national data were assigned to treatments, adverse events, and BRCA1/2 test. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: Global olaparib was the most effective strategy, followed by BRCA1/2 testing and no olaparib. BRCA1/2 testing had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $193,442 per progression-free year of life saved (PF-YLS) compared to no olaparib, whereas global olaparib had an ICER of $234,128 per PF-YLS compared to BRCA1/2 testing. At a 52% lower-than-baseline olaparib cost estimate of $3000 per month, BRCA1/2 testing became potentially cost-effective compared with observation, with an ICER of $100,000 per PF-YLS. When strategy (1) was removed from the analysis, BRCA1/2 testing was the preferred strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of maintenance olaparib in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer is not cost-effective regardless of whether BRCA1/2 testing is used to direct treatment. However, BRCA1/2 testing is a preferred strategy compared to global maintenance olaparib alone.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Int J Gynecol Cancer

DOI

EISSN

1525-1438

Publication Date

June 2013

Volume

23

Issue

5

Start / End Page

846 / 852

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Survival Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
  • Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1
  • Platinum
  • Piperazines
  • Phthalazines
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Secord, A. A., Barnett, J. C., Ledermann, J. A., Peterson, B. L., Myers, E. R., & Havrilesky, L. J. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing to target PARP inhibitor use in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 23(5), 846–852. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829527bd
Secord, Angeles Alvarez, Jason Cory Barnett, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Bercedis L. Peterson, Evan R. Myers, and Laura J. Havrilesky. “Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing to target PARP inhibitor use in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.Int J Gynecol Cancer 23, no. 5 (June 2013): 846–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829527bd.
Secord AA, Barnett JC, Ledermann JA, Peterson BL, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing to target PARP inhibitor use in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jun;23(5):846–52.
Secord, Angeles Alvarez, et al. “Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing to target PARP inhibitor use in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.Int J Gynecol Cancer, vol. 23, no. 5, June 2013, pp. 846–52. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829527bd.
Secord AA, Barnett JC, Ledermann JA, Peterson BL, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost-effectiveness of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing to target PARP inhibitor use in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jun;23(5):846–852.
Journal cover image

Published In

Int J Gynecol Cancer

DOI

EISSN

1525-1438

Publication Date

June 2013

Volume

23

Issue

5

Start / End Page

846 / 852

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Survival Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
  • Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1
  • Platinum
  • Piperazines
  • Phthalazines
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging