Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Hypothesis formulation from subgroup analyses: nonadherence or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use explains the lack of clinical benefit of aspirin on first myocardial infarction attributed to "aspirin resistance".

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hennekens, CH; Schneider, WR; Hebert, PR; Tantry, US; Gurbel, PA
Published in: Am Heart J
May 2010

BACKGROUND: "Aspirin resistance" has been defined as the occurrence of cardiovascular events despite regular intake of aspirin. One major analytic study suggesting that "aspirin resistance" is a clinical reality was unable to control for confounding by nonadherence or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: We formulated a hypothesis from subgroup analyses in the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial testing 325 mg of aspirin every other day among 22,071 apparently healthy US male physicians. We classified participants by nonadherence or NSAIDs and used time-varying Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: After 5 years, the blinded aspirin component was terminated early based on the unanimous recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Of 378 confirmed first myocardial infarctions (139 aspirin and 239 placebo), the relative risk (RR) was 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.70, P < .00001). There was no statistically significant reduction among aspirin <150/180 pills/y (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.35, P = .62) or NSAID users >60 days per year (RR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.68-3.47, P = .31). There was a statistically significant reduction among aspirin >150/180 pills/y and NSAID users <60 days/y (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.44-0.70, P < or = .0001) and an increase among aspirin <150/180 pills/y and NSAID users >60 days/y (RR of 3.43, 95% CI 1.41-8.33, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: In subgroup analyses useful to formulate hypotheses from a large randomized trial in apparently healthy men, aspirin nonadherence or NSAID use explained the lack of clinical benefit of aspirin on first myocardial infarction that has been attributed to "aspirin resistance." Direct randomized comparisons are necessary in trials designed a priori to test this hypothesis.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

May 2010

Volume

159

Issue

5

Start / End Page

744 / 748

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Patient Compliance
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Drug Tolerance
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Aspirin
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hennekens, C. H., Schneider, W. R., Hebert, P. R., Tantry, U. S., & Gurbel, P. A. (2010). Hypothesis formulation from subgroup analyses: nonadherence or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use explains the lack of clinical benefit of aspirin on first myocardial infarction attributed to "aspirin resistance". Am Heart J, 159(5), 744–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.033
Hennekens, Charles H., Wendy R. Schneider, Patricia R. Hebert, Udaya S. Tantry, and Paul A. Gurbel. “Hypothesis formulation from subgroup analyses: nonadherence or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use explains the lack of clinical benefit of aspirin on first myocardial infarction attributed to "aspirin resistance".Am Heart J 159, no. 5 (May 2010): 744–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.033.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

May 2010

Volume

159

Issue

5

Start / End Page

744 / 748

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Patient Compliance
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Drug Tolerance
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Aspirin
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal