Skip to main content

[Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications].

Publication ,  Journal Article
Steyerberg, EW; Van Calster, B; Pencina, MJ
Published in: Rev Esp Cardiol
September 2011

Prediction models are becoming more and more important in medicine and cardiology. Nowadays, specific interest focuses on ways in which models can be improved using new prognostic markers. We aim to describe the similarities and differences between performance measures for prediction models. We analyzed data from 3264 subjects to predict 10-year risk of coronary heart disease according to age, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking. We specifically study the incremental value of adding high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to this model. We emphasize that we need to separate the evaluation of predictions, where traditional performance measures such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration are useful, from the evaluation of classifications, where various other statistics are now available, including the net reclassification index and net benefit.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Rev Esp Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1579-2242

Publication Date

September 2011

Volume

64

Issue

9

Start / End Page

788 / 794

Location

Spain

Related Subject Headings

  • ROC Curve
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Heart Diseases
  • Forecasting
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Cholesterol, HDL
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Steyerberg, E. W., Van Calster, B., & Pencina, M. J. (2011). [Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications]. Rev Esp Cardiol, 64(9), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2011.04.017
Steyerberg, Ewout W., Ben Van Calster, and Michael J. Pencina. “[Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications].Rev Esp Cardiol 64, no. 9 (September 2011): 788–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2011.04.017.
Steyerberg EW, Van Calster B, Pencina MJ. [Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):788–94.
Steyerberg, Ewout W., et al. “[Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications].Rev Esp Cardiol, vol. 64, no. 9, Sept. 2011, pp. 788–94. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2011.04.017.
Steyerberg EW, Van Calster B, Pencina MJ. [Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):788–794.

Published In

Rev Esp Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1579-2242

Publication Date

September 2011

Volume

64

Issue

9

Start / End Page

788 / 794

Location

Spain

Related Subject Headings

  • ROC Curve
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Heart Diseases
  • Forecasting
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Cholesterol, HDL
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology