Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Podberesky, DJ; Angel, E; Yoshizumi, TT; Toncheva, G; Salisbury, SR; Brody, AS; Alsip, C; Barelli, A; Egelhoff, JC; Anderson-Evans, C; Dow, D ...
Published in: Acad Radiol
September 2013

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Efforts to decrease radiation exposure during pediatric high-resolution thoracic computed tomography (HRCT), while maintaining diagnostic image quality, are imperative. The objective of this investigation was to compare organ doses and scan performance for pediatric HRCT using volume, helical, and noncontiguous axial acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thoracic organ doses were measured using 20 metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters. Mean and median organ doses and scan durations were determined and compared for three acquisition modes in a 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantom using similar clinical pediatric scan parameters. Image noise was measured and compared in identical regions within the thorax. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower dose in lung (1.8 vs 2.7 mGy, P < .02) and thymus (2.3 vs 2.7 mGy, P < .02) between volume and noncontiguous axial modes and in lung (1.8 vs 2.3 mGy, P < .02), breast (1.8 vs 2.6 mGy, P < .02), and thymus (2.3 vs 2.4 mGy, P < .02) between volume and helical modes. There was a significantly lower median image noise for volume compared to helical and axial modes in lung (55.6 vs 79.3 and 70.7) and soft tissue (76.0 vs 111.3 and 89.9). Scan times for volume, helical, and noncontiguous axial acquisitions were 0.35, 3.9, and 24.5 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSION: Volumetric HRCT provides an opportunity for thoracic organ dose and image noise reduction, at significantly faster scanning speeds, which may benefit pediatric patients undergoing surveillance studies for diffuse lung disease.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Acad Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1878-4046

Publication Date

September 2013

Volume

20

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1152 / 1161

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Whole-Body Counting
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Radiation Protection
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Phantoms, Imaging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Podberesky, D. J., Angel, E., Yoshizumi, T. T., Toncheva, G., Salisbury, S. R., Brody, A. S., … Frush, D. P. (2013). Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions. Acad Radiol, 20(9), 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.05.013
Podberesky, Daniel J., Erin Angel, Terry T. Yoshizumi, Greta Toncheva, Shelia R. Salisbury, Alan S. Brody, Christopher Alsip, et al. “Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.Acad Radiol 20, no. 9 (September 2013): 1152–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.05.013.
Podberesky DJ, Angel E, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Salisbury SR, Brody AS, Alsip C, Barelli A, Egelhoff JC, Anderson-Evans C, Nguyen GB, Dow D, Frush DP. Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions. Acad Radiol. 2013 Sep;20(9):1152–1161.
Journal cover image

Published In

Acad Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1878-4046

Publication Date

September 2013

Volume

20

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1152 / 1161

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Whole-Body Counting
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Radiation Protection
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Phantoms, Imaging