Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fritz, J; Hummel, J; Kienzle, E; Arnold, C; Nunn, C; Clauss, M
Published in: Oikos
November 1, 2009

Although the relevance of particle size reduction in herbivore digestion is widely appreciated, few studies have investigated digesta particle size across species in relation to body mass or digestive strategy. We investigated faecal particle size, which reflects the size of ingesta particles after both mastication and specialized processes such as rumination. Particle size was measured by wet sieving samples from more than 700 captive individuals representing 193 mammalian species. Using phylogenetic generalized least squares, faecal particle size scaled to body mass with an exponent of 0.22 (95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.28). In comparisons among different digestive strategies, we found that (1) equids had smaller faecal particles than other hindgut fermenters, (2) non-ruminant foregut fermenters and hindgut fermenters had similar-sized faecal particles (not significantly different), and (3) ruminants had finer faecal particles than non-ruminants. These results confirm that the relationship between chewing efficiency and body mass is modified by morphological adaptations in dental design and physiological adaptations to chewing, such as rumination. This allometric relationship should be considered when investigating the effect of body size on digestive physiology, and digestion studies should include a measure of faecal particle size. © 2009 Oikos.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Oikos

DOI

EISSN

1600-0706

ISSN

0030-1299

Publication Date

November 1, 2009

Volume

118

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1623 / 1632

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0602 Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fritz, J., Hummel, J., Kienzle, E., Arnold, C., Nunn, C., & Clauss, M. (2009). Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores. Oikos, 118(11), 1623–1632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17807.x
Fritz, J., J. Hummel, E. Kienzle, C. Arnold, C. Nunn, and M. Clauss. “Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores.” Oikos 118, no. 11 (November 1, 2009): 1623–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17807.x.
Fritz J, Hummel J, Kienzle E, Arnold C, Nunn C, Clauss M. Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores. Oikos. 2009 Nov 1;118(11):1623–32.
Fritz, J., et al. “Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores.” Oikos, vol. 118, no. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 1623–32. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17807.x.
Fritz J, Hummel J, Kienzle E, Arnold C, Nunn C, Clauss M. Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores. Oikos. 2009 Nov 1;118(11):1623–1632.
Journal cover image

Published In

Oikos

DOI

EISSN

1600-0706

ISSN

0030-1299

Publication Date

November 1, 2009

Volume

118

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1623 / 1632

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0602 Ecology