Skip to main content

Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Romanens, M; Ackermann, F; Spence, JD; Darioli, R; Rodondi, N; Corti, R; Noll, G; Schwenkglenks, M; Pencina, M
Published in: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
February 2010

Cardiovascular risk assessment might be improved with the addition of emerging, new tests derived from atherosclerosis imaging, laboratory tests or functional tests. This article reviews relative risk, odds ratios, receiver-operating curves, posttest risk calculations based on likelihood ratios, the net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination. This serves to determine whether a new test has an added clinical value on top of conventional risk testing and how this can be verified statistically. Two clinically meaningful examples serve to illustrate novel approaches. This work serves as a review and basic work for the development of new guidelines on cardiovascular risk prediction, taking into account emerging tests, to be proposed by members of the 'Taskforce on Vascular Risk Prediction' under the auspices of the Working Group 'Swiss Atherosclerosis' of the Swiss Society of Cardiology in the future.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1741-8275

Publication Date

February 2010

Volume

17

Issue

1

Start / End Page

18 / 23

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • ROC Curve
  • Prognosis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
  • Models, Statistical
  • Likelihood Functions
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Romanens, M., Ackermann, F., Spence, J. D., Darioli, R., Rodondi, N., Corti, R., … Pencina, M. (2010). Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 17(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283347059
Romanens, Michel, Franz Ackermann, John David Spence, Roger Darioli, Nicolas Rodondi, Roberto Corti, Georg Noll, Matthias Schwenkglenks, and Michael Pencina. “Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics.Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 17, no. 1 (February 2010): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283347059.
Romanens M, Ackermann F, Spence JD, Darioli R, Rodondi N, Corti R, et al. Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):18–23.
Romanens, Michel, et al. “Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics.Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, vol. 17, no. 1, Feb. 2010, pp. 18–23. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283347059.
Romanens M, Ackermann F, Spence JD, Darioli R, Rodondi N, Corti R, Noll G, Schwenkglenks M, Pencina M. Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):18–23.

Published In

Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1741-8275

Publication Date

February 2010

Volume

17

Issue

1

Start / End Page

18 / 23

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • ROC Curve
  • Prognosis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
  • Models, Statistical
  • Likelihood Functions