Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Romagnoli, E; De Vita, M; Burzotta, F; Cortese, B; Biondi-Zoccai, G; Summaria, F; Patrizi, R; Lanzillo, C; Lucci, V; Cavazza, C; Tarantino, F ...
Published in: Am Heart J
December 2013

BACKGROUND: The role of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-risk acute patients remains debated. Device-related complications and the more complex patient management could explain such lack of clinical benefit. We aimed to assess the impact of transradial versus transfemoral access for PCI requiring IABP support on vascular complications and clinical outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 321 consecutive patients receiving IABP support during transfemoral (n = 209) or transradial (n = 112) PCI. Thirty-day net adverse clinical events (NACEs) (composite of postprocedural bleeding, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stroke) were the primary end point, with access-related bleeding and hospital stay as secondary end points. RESULTS: Cardiogenic shock and hemodynamic instability were the most common indications for IABP support. Cumulative 30-day NACE rate was 50.2%, whereas an access site-related bleeding occurred in 14.3%. Patients undergoing transfemoral PCI had a higher unadjusted rate of NACEs when compared with the transradial group (57.4% vs 36.6%, P < .01), mainly due more access-related bleedings (18.7% vs 6.3%, P < .01). Such increased risk of NACEs was confirmed after propensity score adjustment (hazard ratio 0.57 [0.4-0.9], P = .007), whereas hospital stay appeared comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational registry, high-risk patients undergoing PCI and requiring IABP support appeared to have fewer NACEs if transradial access was used instead of transfemoral, mainly due to fewer access-related bleedings. Given the inherent limitations of this retrospective work, including the inability to adjust for unknown confounders, further controlled studies are warranted to confirm or refute these findings.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

December 2013

Volume

166

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1019 / 1026

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radial Artery
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping
  • Humans
  • Femoral Artery
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Romagnoli, E., De Vita, M., Burzotta, F., Cortese, B., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Summaria, F., … Trani, C. (2013). Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry. Am Heart J, 166(6), 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009
Romagnoli, Enrico, Maria De Vita, Francesco Burzotta, Bernardo Cortese, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Francesco Summaria, Roberto Patrizi, et al. “Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.Am Heart J 166, no. 6 (December 2013): 1019–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009.
Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, Cortese B, Biondi-Zoccai G, Summaria F, et al. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry. Am Heart J. 2013 Dec;166(6):1019–26.
Romagnoli, Enrico, et al. “Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.Am Heart J, vol. 166, no. 6, Dec. 2013, pp. 1019–26. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009.
Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, Cortese B, Biondi-Zoccai G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Lanzillo C, Lucci V, Cavazza C, Tarantino F, Sangiorgi GM, Lioy E, Crea F, Rao SV, Trani C. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry. Am Heart J. 2013 Dec;166(6):1019–1026.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

December 2013

Volume

166

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1019 / 1026

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radial Artery
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping
  • Humans
  • Femoral Artery