Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Alternative dynamic regimes and trophic control of plant succession

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schmitz, OJ; Kalies, EL; Booth, MG
Published in: Ecosystems
June 1, 2006

Ecological succession has been the subject of intense study and debate throughout the history of ecology as conceptualizations of process were proposed and refined. Modern concepts view ecological succession as largely driven by bottom-up resource competition for light and nutrients. However, growing evidence shows that top-down effects of consumers can govern succession. These contrasting perspectives require synthesis. We offer such a synthesis by revitalizing the hypothesis that succession proceeds by abrupt transitions to alternative states or dynamic regimes. We present evidence from field sampling along two successional gradients in a New England old field aimed at identifying pattern, and from experimentation in the same field aimed at identifying process. Field sampling revealed that a competitive dominant plant existed in a mosaic with two distinct patch types of relative abundances (≤ 25% and > 30%). Competitive dominant plant abundance varied systematically with plant species diversity (evenness), and resource supply (light and soil nitrogen). The six-year field experiment tested for alternative regimes by systematic removal and staggered reintroduction of top predators. Long-term predator removal caused an abrupt and irreversible shift from a top-down to a bottom-up controlled regime with a breakpoint at approximately 25% relative abundance of the competitive dominant plant. This caused significant shifts in plant species evenness and resource supply (solar radiation and N mineralization rate). Moreover, the competitive dominant abundance, species evenness and resource supply in the two dynamic regimes matched levels in the different patch types in the field. We conclude that a single ecosystem can display both top-down and bottom-up control. Abrupt shifts in trophic control lead to abrupt changes in the rate of development of ecosystems consistent with a working hypothesis that succession proceeds via abrupt regime shifts. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Ecosystems

DOI

EISSN

1435-0629

ISSN

1432-9840

Publication Date

June 1, 2006

Volume

9

Issue

4

Start / End Page

659 / 672

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schmitz, O. J., Kalies, E. L., & Booth, M. G. (2006). Alternative dynamic regimes and trophic control of plant succession. Ecosystems, 9(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0006-4
Schmitz, O. J., E. L. Kalies, and M. G. Booth. “Alternative dynamic regimes and trophic control of plant succession.” Ecosystems 9, no. 4 (June 1, 2006): 659–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0006-4.
Schmitz OJ, Kalies EL, Booth MG. Alternative dynamic regimes and trophic control of plant succession. Ecosystems. 2006 Jun 1;9(4):659–72.
Schmitz, O. J., et al. “Alternative dynamic regimes and trophic control of plant succession.” Ecosystems, vol. 9, no. 4, June 2006, pp. 659–72. Scopus, doi:10.1007/s10021-006-0006-4.
Schmitz OJ, Kalies EL, Booth MG. Alternative dynamic regimes and trophic control of plant succession. Ecosystems. 2006 Jun 1;9(4):659–672.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ecosystems

DOI

EISSN

1435-0629

ISSN

1432-9840

Publication Date

June 1, 2006

Volume

9

Issue

4

Start / End Page

659 / 672

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences