Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Purnell, TS; Powe, NR; Troll, MU; Wang, N-Y; LaVeist, TA; Boulware, LE
Published in: Transpl Int
October 2011

Little is known about racial/ethnic differences in preferred methods of disclosing deceased organ donation intentions among persons not previously designating their organ donation preferences publicly or the association of medical mistrust with preferences. We surveyed 307 United States (US) adults who had not yet designated their donation intentions via drivers' licenses or organ donor cards (nondesignators) to identify their preferred disclosure methods (personal discussions with family, physicians, or religious representatives or public registration via mail/telephone/computer, workplace, place of religious worship, or grocery store/bank/post office) and to assess the association of mistrust with preferences. In multivariable models, we assessed racial/ethnic differences in preferences and the influence of medical mistrust on preferences. Nondesignators most preferred discussions with physicians (65%) or family members (63%). After adjustment, African Americans (AAs) were more likely than Whites to prefer discussion with religious representatives. In contrast, AAs and Hispanics were less likely than Whites to prefer registration at a workplace or through mail/telephone/computer. Medical mistrust was common and associated with less willingness to disclose via several methods. Encouraging donation intention disclosure via discussions with physicians, family, and religious representatives and addressing medical mistrust could enhance strategies to improve nondesignators' donation rates.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Transpl Int

DOI

EISSN

1432-2277

Publication Date

October 2011

Volume

24

Issue

10

Start / End Page

999 / 1007

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Trust
  • Tissue Donors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Surgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intention
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Purnell, T. S., Powe, N. R., Troll, M. U., Wang, N.-Y., LaVeist, T. A., & Boulware, L. E. (2011). Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs. Transpl Int, 24(10), 999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x
Purnell, Tanjala S., Neil R. Powe, Misty U. Troll, Nae-Yuh Wang, Thomas A. LaVeist, and L Ebony Boulware. “Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs.Transpl Int 24, no. 10 (October 2011): 999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x.
Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, Wang N-Y, LaVeist TA, Boulware LE. Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs. Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):999–1007.
Purnell, Tanjala S., et al. “Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs.Transpl Int, vol. 24, no. 10, Oct. 2011, pp. 999–1007. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x.
Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, Wang N-Y, LaVeist TA, Boulware LE. Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs. Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):999–1007.
Journal cover image

Published In

Transpl Int

DOI

EISSN

1432-2277

Publication Date

October 2011

Volume

24

Issue

10

Start / End Page

999 / 1007

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Trust
  • Tissue Donors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Surgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intention
  • Humans
  • Female