Skip to main content

Anirudh Krishna

Edgar T. Thompson Distinguished Professor of Public Policy in the Sanford School of Public Policy
Sanford School of Public Policy
Box 90245, Durham, NC 27708-0245
212 Sanford Inst Bldg, Durham, NC 27708
Office hours By appointment  

Scholarly Works - Book sections


Rural-urban inequality and poverty

Book section · July 6, 2017 Full text Cite

PART 2: Seasonal livelihoods

Book section · January 1, 2013 Cite

Poverty knowledge and poverty action in India

Book section · October 4, 2010 Cite

Subjective Assessments, Participatory Methods, and Poverty Dynamics

Book section · May 1, 2009 This chapter discusses the stages of progress method for the assessment of poverty. It tracks households in five countries: four developing countries and the United States. The methodology has seven steps: (i) get together representative community group; ( ... Full text Cite

Conclusion: Implications for policy and research

Book section · January 1, 2008 Since the mid-twentieth century academic and intellectual understandings of the role of mass publics in democracy has been Schumpeterian in its conclusion that extensive political participation by the poor or the working classes would be antithetical to de ... Full text Cite

Introduction: Poor people and democracy

Book section · January 1, 2008 Social scientists have steadily believed that democracies will more likely exist in richer rather than poorer countries. Analyses of cross-country data have consistently shown democracy to be more prevalent and more stable in countries that have higher-tha ... Full text Cite

Do poor people care less for democracy? Testing individual-level assumptions with individual-level data from India

Book section · January 1, 2008 The positive effect of higher wealth on democracy was asserted by Lipset (1960: 31): “democracy is related to the state of economic development…the more well-to-do a nation, the greater the chances it will sustain democracy.” Later studies have overwhelmin ... Full text Cite

Politics in the middle: Mediating relationships between the citizens and the state in rural North India

Book section · January 1, 2007 Caste and patron–client links have been regarded most often as the building blocks of political organization in India, especially in its rural parts (Migdal 1988; Weiner 1989), and caste associations have been thought to be the pre-eminent mode of interest ... Full text Cite