Skip to main content
release_alert
Welcome to the new Scholars 3.0! Read about new features and let us know what you think.
cancel

Agreement between total corneal astigmatism calculated by vector summation and total corneal astigmatism measured by ray tracing using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Feizi, S; Delfazayebaher, S; Ownagh, V; Sadeghpour, F
Published in: Journal of Optometry
April 2018

To evaluate the agreement between total corneal astigmatism calculated by vector summation of anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism (TCAVec) and total corneal astigmatism measured by ray tracing (TCARay).This study enrolled a total of 204 right eyes of 204 normal subjects. The eyes were measured using a Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. The measured parameters included simulated keratometric astigmatism using the keratometric index, anterior corneal astigmatism using the corneal refractive index, posterior corneal astigmatism, and TCARay. TCAVec was derived by vector summation of the astigmatism on the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. The magnitudes and axes of TCAVec and TCARay were compared. The Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the relationship and agreement between TCAVec and TCARay, respectively.The mean TCAVec and TCARay magnitudes were 0.76±0.57D and 1.00±0.78D, respectively (P<0.001). The mean axis orientations were 85.12±30.26° and 89.67±36.76°, respectively (P=0.02). Strong correlations were found between the TCAVec and TCARay magnitudes (r=0.96, P<0.001). Moderate associations were observed between the TCAVec and TCARay axes (r=0.75, P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots produced the 95% limits of agreement for the TCAVec and TCARay magnitudes from -0.33 to 0.82D. The 95% limits of agreement between the TCAVec and TCARay axes was -43.0 to 52.1°.The magnitudes and axes of astigmatisms measured by the vector summation and ray tracing methods cannot be used interchangeably. There was a systematic error between the TCAVec and TCARay magnitudes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Optometry

DOI

EISSN

1989-1342

ISSN

1888-4296

Publication Date

April 2018

Volume

11

Issue

2

Start / End Page

113 / 120

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Visual Acuity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Refraction, Ocular
  • Prospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Feizi, S., Delfazayebaher, S., Ownagh, V., & Sadeghpour, F. (2018). Agreement between total corneal astigmatism calculated by vector summation and total corneal astigmatism measured by ray tracing using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. Journal of Optometry, 11(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2017.05.003
Feizi, Sepehr, Siamak Delfazayebaher, Vahid Ownagh, and Fatemeh Sadeghpour. “Agreement between total corneal astigmatism calculated by vector summation and total corneal astigmatism measured by ray tracing using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.Journal of Optometry 11, no. 2 (April 2018): 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2017.05.003.
Feizi, Sepehr, et al. “Agreement between total corneal astigmatism calculated by vector summation and total corneal astigmatism measured by ray tracing using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.Journal of Optometry, vol. 11, no. 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 113–20. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.optom.2017.05.003.

Published In

Journal of Optometry

DOI

EISSN

1989-1342

ISSN

1888-4296

Publication Date

April 2018

Volume

11

Issue

2

Start / End Page

113 / 120

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Visual Acuity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Refraction, Ocular
  • Prospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological