Skip to main content
Journal cover image

EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bertram, MG; Ågerstrand, M; Thoré, ESJ; Allen, J; Balshine, S; Brand, JA; Brooks, BW; Dang, Z; Duquesne, S; Ford, AT; Hoffmann, F; Hollert, H ...
Published in: Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
April 2025

Behavioural analysis has been attracting significant attention as a broad indicator of sub-lethal toxicity and has secured a place as an important subdiscipline in ecotoxicology. Among the most notable characteristics of behavioural research, compared to other established approaches in sub-lethal ecotoxicology (e.g. reproductive and developmental bioassays), are the wide range of study designs being used and the diversity of endpoints considered. At the same time, environmental hazard and risk assessment, which underpins regulatory decisions to protect the environment from potentially harmful chemicals, often recommends that ecotoxicological data be produced following accepted and validated test guidelines. These guidelines typically do not address behavioural changes, meaning that these, often sensitive, effects are not represented in hazard and risk assessments. Here, we propose a new tool, the EthoCRED evaluation method, for assessing the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity data, which considers the unique requirements and challenges encountered in this field. This method and accompanying reporting recommendations are designed to serve as an extension of the "Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data (CRED)" project. As such, EthoCRED can both accommodate the wide array of experimental design approaches seen in behavioural ecotoxicology, and could be readily implemented into regulatory frameworks as deemed appropriate by policy makers of different jurisdictions to allow better integration of knowledge gained from behavioural testing into environmental protection. Furthermore, through our reporting recommendations, we aim to improve the reporting of behavioural studies in the peer-reviewed literature, and thereby increase their usefulness to inform chemical regulation.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

DOI

EISSN

1469-185X

ISSN

1464-7931

Publication Date

April 2025

Volume

100

Issue

2

Start / End Page

556 / 585

Related Subject Headings

  • Toxicity Tests
  • Risk Assessment
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Environmental Pollutants
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Animals
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bertram, M. G., Ågerstrand, M., Thoré, E. S. J., Allen, J., Balshine, S., Brand, J. A., … Brodin, T. (2025). EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 100(2), 556–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13154
Bertram, Michael G., Marlene Ågerstrand, Eli S. J. Thoré, Joel Allen, Sigal Balshine, Jack A. Brand, Bryan W. Brooks, et al. “EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 100, no. 2 (April 2025): 556–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13154.
Bertram MG, Ågerstrand M, Thoré ESJ, Allen J, Balshine S, Brand JA, et al. EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2025 Apr;100(2):556–85.
Bertram, Michael G., et al. “EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 100, no. 2, Apr. 2025, pp. 556–85. Epmc, doi:10.1111/brv.13154.
Bertram MG, Ågerstrand M, Thoré ESJ, Allen J, Balshine S, Brand JA, Brooks BW, Dang Z, Duquesne S, Ford AT, Hoffmann F, Hollert H, Jacob S, Kloas W, Klüver N, Lazorchak J, Ledesma M, Maack G, Macartney EL, Martin JM, Melvin SD, Michelangeli M, Mohr S, Padilla S, Pyle G, Saaristo M, Sahm R, Smit E, Steevens JA, van den Berg S, Vossen LE, Wlodkowic D, Wong BBM, Ziegler M, Brodin T. EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2025 Apr;100(2):556–585.
Journal cover image

Published In

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

DOI

EISSN

1469-185X

ISSN

1464-7931

Publication Date

April 2025

Volume

100

Issue

2

Start / End Page

556 / 585

Related Subject Headings

  • Toxicity Tests
  • Risk Assessment
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Environmental Pollutants
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Animals
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences