Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain-a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET).

Journal articles  - Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Pragmatic Clinical Trial
McCormick, ZL; Lester, DD; DePalma, MJ; Gilmore, CA; Li, S; Jameson, JB; Desai, MJ; Weaver, TE; Lad, SP; Davidoff, SJ; Trainor, DM; Engle, MP ...
Published in: Pain Med
April 1, 2026

OBJECTIVE: Management of refractory chronic low back pain (CLBP) includes a range of treatments (eg, physical therapy, injections, ablations, neurostimulation, surgery) with varying utilization and effectiveness. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of one treatment option, percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), compared to usual care with standard interventional management for CLBP. METHODS: Two hundred thirty patients with CLBP were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Group 1 (percutaneous 60-day PNS) or Group 2 (physician-directed usual care with standard interventional management). The Primary Clinical Endpoint evaluated the proportion of participants with ≥50% reductions in CLBP at 3 months post-treatment compared to baseline. RESULTS: At the Primary Endpoint, a greater proportion of participants receiving percutaneous 60-day PNS (55%; n = 112; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 45-65) experienced ≥50% pain relief compared to usual care with standard interventional management (26%; n = 110; 95% CI = 17-34; P < .001). Concordant with the Primary Endpoint, percutaneous 60-day PNS also produced greater improvements in patient-centric secondary endpoints, including disability, pain interference, health-related quality of life, and analgesic consumption. Reductions in pain and resulting improvements in function were sustained through 6 months with percutaneous 60-day PNS. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective multicenter pragmatic RCT met its Primary Clinical Endpoint and found that more participants with CLBP reported pain relief at 3 months after receiving percutaneous 60-day PNS as compared to usual care with standard interventional management. Participants treated with 60-day PNS showed greater reductions in pain and more substantial improvements in functional outcomes through 6 months. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04246281; Primary funding: Department of Defense (DoD), with additional funding needed to complete the study provided by the study's sponsor, SPR.The protocol is available on ClinicalTrials.gov. The statistical analysis plan and results will be made available within 12 months of the study's completion.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Pain Med

DOI

EISSN

1526-4637

Publication Date

April 1, 2026

Volume

27

Issue

4

Start / End Page

462 / 473

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain Management
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Low Back Pain
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Chronic Pain
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
McCormick, Z. L., Lester, D. D., DePalma, M. J., Gilmore, C. A., Li, S., Jameson, J. B., … Boggs, J. W. (2026). Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain-a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET). Pain Med, 27(4), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf147
McCormick, Zachary L., Denise D. Lester, Michael J. DePalma, Christopher A. Gilmore, Sean Li, Jessica B. Jameson, Mehul J. Desai, et al. “Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain-a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET).Pain Med 27, no. 4 (April 1, 2026): 462–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf147.
McCormick ZL, Lester DD, DePalma MJ, Gilmore CA, Li S, Jameson JB, Desai MJ, Weaver TE, Lad SP, Davidoff SJ, Trainor DM, Amirdelfan K, Engle MP, Deer TR, Lee TS, Vetri F, Bindal M, Tornero-Bold MA, Nasseri MN, Cohen SP, Clark WH, McGee MJ, Boggs JW. Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain-a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET). Pain Med. 2026 Apr 1;27(4):462–473.
Journal cover image

Published In

Pain Med

DOI

EISSN

1526-4637

Publication Date

April 1, 2026

Volume

27

Issue

4

Start / End Page

462 / 473

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain Management
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Low Back Pain
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Chronic Pain