Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial.

Journal articles  - Multicenter Study, Journal Article
Truong, QA; Schulman-Marcus, J; Zakroysky, P; Chou, ET; Nagurney, JT; Fleg, JL; Schoenfeld, DA; Udelson, JE; Hoffmann, U; Woodard, PK
Published in: Journal of the American Heart Association
March 2016

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reduces emergency department length of stay compared with standard evaluation in patients with low- and intermediate-risk acute chest pain. Whether diabetic patients have similar benefits is unknown.In this prespecified analysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT II) multicenter trial, we randomized 1000 patients (17% diabetic) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome to CCTA or standard evaluation. The rate of acute coronary syndrome was 8% in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P=1.0). Length of stay was unaffected by the CCTA strategy for diabetic patients (23.9 versus 27.2 hours, P=0.86) but was reduced for nondiabetic patients compared with standard evaluation (8.4 versus 26.5 hours, P<0.0001; P interaction=0.004). CCTA resulted in 3-fold more direct emergency department discharge in both groups (each P≤0.0001, P interaction=0.27). No difference in hospital admissions was seen between the 2 strategies in diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P interaction=0.09). Both groups had more downstream testing and higher radiation doses with CCTA, but these were highest in diabetic patients (all P interaction≤0.04). Diabetic patients had fewer normal CCTAs than nondiabetic patients (32% versus 50%, P=0.003) and similar normalcy rates with standard evaluation (P=0.70). Notably, 66% of diabetic patients had no or mild stenosis by CCTA with short length of stay comparable to that of nondiabetic patients (P=0.34), whereas those with >50% stenosis had a high prevalence of acute coronary syndrome, invasive coronary angiography, and revascularization.Knowledge of coronary anatomy with CCTA is beneficial for diabetic patients and can discriminate between lower risk patients with no or little coronary artery disease who can be discharged immediately and higher risk patients with moderate to severe disease who warrant further workup.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01084239.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Journal of the American Heart Association

DOI

EISSN

2047-9980

ISSN

2047-9980

Publication Date

March 2016

Volume

5

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e003137

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Time Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Patient Discharge
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Truong, Q. A., Schulman-Marcus, J., Zakroysky, P., Chou, E. T., Nagurney, J. T., Fleg, J. L., … Woodard, P. K. (2016). Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association, 5(3), e003137. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.003137
Truong, Quynh A., Joshua Schulman-Marcus, Pearl Zakroysky, Eric T. Chou, John T. Nagurney, Jerome L. Fleg, David A. Schoenfeld, James E. Udelson, Udo Hoffmann, and Pamela K. Woodard. “Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association 5, no. 3 (March 2016): e003137. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.003137.
Truong QA, Schulman-Marcus J, Zakroysky P, Chou ET, Nagurney JT, Fleg JL, Schoenfeld DA, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U, Woodard PK. Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016 Mar;5(3):e003137.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of the American Heart Association

DOI

EISSN

2047-9980

ISSN

2047-9980

Publication Date

March 2016

Volume

5

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e003137

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Time Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Patient Discharge
  • Middle Aged
  • Male