Skip to main content
Journal cover image

De-implementing Spinal Injections in Pursuit of Value-Based Care: Rethinking Pain Relief.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ballengee, LA; Lentz, TA; Goertz, C; McStay, F; Morken, I; George, SZ
Published in: J Pain
February 25, 2026

Despite guideline recommendations to the contrary, patients experiencing low back pain are commonly exposed to low-value care. Spinal injections for chronic low back pain are a key example of this disconnect. Their persistence highlights the broader challenge of removing low-value practices in pain care. Low-value interventions rarely fade with the introduction of new treatments; rather, their continued use reflects entrenched reimbursement incentives, provider training norms, and patient expectations. This Focus Article applies implementation science concepts to examine spinal injections as an obvious candidate for de-implementation away from existing practice patterns. Evidence of limited effectiveness and risks is summarized, alongside multilevel determinants that sustain ongoing use at the provider, patient, organizational, and system levels. A range of strategies is mapped to guide change and a four-step roadmap is presented to operationalize these concepts. Embedding de-implementation of spinal injections alongside implementation efforts for other pain management options reframes change as an intentional redesign of care delivery rather than a withdrawal of treatment. By redirecting resources away from ineffective procedures and toward evidence-based alternatives, de-implementation offers a proactive pathway to improve outcomes, enhance equity, reduce waste, and strengthen patient trust in pain management. PERSPECTIVE: This article applies an implementation science lens to spinal injections for chronic low back pain. By outlining barriers, strategies, and describing a practical roadmap, it reframes de-implementation as a proactive quality improvement approach that offers other viable treatment options while redirecting resources towards higher value treatment options for pain management.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Pain

DOI

EISSN

1528-8447

Publication Date

February 25, 2026

Start / End Page

106245

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Anesthesiology
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ballengee, L. A., Lentz, T. A., Goertz, C., McStay, F., Morken, I., & George, S. Z. (2026). De-implementing Spinal Injections in Pursuit of Value-Based Care: Rethinking Pain Relief. J Pain, 106245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106245
Ballengee, Lindsay A., Trevor A. Lentz, Christine Goertz, Frank McStay, Inga Morken, and Steven Z. George. “De-implementing Spinal Injections in Pursuit of Value-Based Care: Rethinking Pain Relief.J Pain, February 25, 2026, 106245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106245.
Ballengee LA, Lentz TA, Goertz C, McStay F, Morken I, George SZ. De-implementing Spinal Injections in Pursuit of Value-Based Care: Rethinking Pain Relief. J Pain. 2026 Feb 25;106245.
Ballengee, Lindsay A., et al. “De-implementing Spinal Injections in Pursuit of Value-Based Care: Rethinking Pain Relief.J Pain, Feb. 2026, p. 106245. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106245.
Ballengee LA, Lentz TA, Goertz C, McStay F, Morken I, George SZ. De-implementing Spinal Injections in Pursuit of Value-Based Care: Rethinking Pain Relief. J Pain. 2026 Feb 25;106245.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Pain

DOI

EISSN

1528-8447

Publication Date

February 25, 2026

Start / End Page

106245

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Anesthesiology
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences