Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Integrating α and β diversity in conservation planning.

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Liang, SP; Li, BV; Huang, RM; Pimm, SL
Published in: Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
March 2026

Conservation planning has long prioritized local species richness (α diversity) but has rarely explicitly integrated species turnover (β diversity) into actionable strategies. Areas with high species turnover lack recognition and protection despite their ecological importance. We devised a simple, standardized, and scalable approach for mapping species turnover. We rasterized species ranges, then counted the range edges of each species in each grid cell. This approach enables high-resolution mapping across regions and facilitates the integration of β diversity into conservation planning. We applied this approach to the Eastern Himalayas, where 3 biodiversity hotspots abut, and used endemic bird species as our focal taxa. Our analyses revealed differences between areas of high species richness and high species turnover. Areas of high species richness were concentrated in montane forests, whereas areas of high species turnover tended to be low in mountain forests and peak in foothills and tree lines. Both areas of high species richness and high species turnover are inadequately protected. We contend that species turnover is a critical, complementary metric to species richness in understanding patterns of biodiversity. In addition, areas of high species turnover host unique species assemblages and face a dual challenge. They host peripheral populations that are more prone to local extinction, and communities within them are particularly sensitive to climate change. These vulnerabilities heighten the urgency of protecting such areas. As conservation planning evolves toward more holistic strategies that address multiple interconnected environmental challenges-such as biodiversity loss, climate change, and water security-it becomes increasingly imperative to integrate both α and β diversity into biodiversity mapping. This integration provides a more representative and ecologically robust foundation for long-term conservation planning.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

DOI

EISSN

1523-1739

ISSN

1523-1739

Publication Date

March 2026

Start / End Page

e70243

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Liang, S. P., Li, B. V., Huang, R. M., & Pimm, S. L. (2026). Integrating α and β diversity in conservation planning. Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, e70243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70243
Liang, Siqi P., Binbin V. Li, Ryan M. Huang, and Stuart L. Pimm. “Integrating α and β diversity in conservation planning.Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, March 2026, e70243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70243.
Liang SP, Li BV, Huang RM, Pimm SL. Integrating α and β diversity in conservation planning. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. 2026 Mar;e70243.
Liang, Siqi P., et al. “Integrating α and β diversity in conservation planning.Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, Mar. 2026, p. e70243. Epmc, doi:10.1111/cobi.70243.
Liang SP, Li BV, Huang RM, Pimm SL. Integrating α and β diversity in conservation planning. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. 2026 Mar;e70243.
Journal cover image

Published In

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

DOI

EISSN

1523-1739

ISSN

1523-1739

Publication Date

March 2026

Start / End Page

e70243

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology